Responses to (Un)healthy advice: Processing and acceptance of health content creators’ nutrition misinformation by youth

Health information, particularly about nutrition, has flourished on social media in recent years. However, these claims often lack proper scrutiny enhancing the risk of misinformation. Nutrition misinformation on social media can originate from various sources including influencers, celebrities, and (freelance) journalists, who often have substantial reach. We conducted a between-subjects experiment, manipulating presence of misinformation and source type (influencer/celebrity/journalist), among N = 480 youth aged 16-22 years. We investigated how nutrition misinformation affects their nutrition (mis)beliefs and dieting. We also tested the moderating role of participants' issue involvement and the mediating role of the sources' perceived expertise. We found that youth remained largely unaffected by nutrition misinformation. However, perceived source expertise acted as a heuristic cue to determine trust in an unknown health content creator. This perceived expertise, in turn, increased perceived healthiness of food products mentioned by the 'expert' content creator regardless of misinformation exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Appetite
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107812
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responses to (Un)healthy advice: Processing and acceptance of health content creators’ nutrition misinformation by youth

Desirée Schmuck, Darian Harff, Margot Lissens
6 citations
Appetite
Misinformation and Its Impacts
6.79
article

Responses to (Un)healthy advice: Processing and acceptance of health content creators’ nutrition misinformation by youth

Desirée Schmuck, Darian Harff, Margot Lissens
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Health information, particularly about nutrition, has flourished on social media in recent years. However, these claims often lack proper scrutiny enhancing the risk of misinformation. Nutrition misinformation on social media can originate from various sources including influencers, celebrities, and (freelance) journalists, who often have substantial reach. We conducted a between-subjects experiment, manipulating presence of misinformation and source type (influencer/celebrity/journalist), among N = 480 youth aged 16-22 years. We investigated how nutrition misinformation affects their nutrition (mis)beliefs and dieting. We also tested the moderating role of participants' issue involvement and the mediating role of the sources' perceived expertise. We found that youth remained largely unaffected by nutrition misinformation. However, perceived source expertise acted as a heuristic cue to determine trust in an unknown health content creator. This perceived expertise, in turn, increased perceived healthiness of food products mentioned by the 'expert' content creator regardless of misinformation exposure.

AppetiteVol. 206
University of Vienna (AT), KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, KU Leuven, Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
6.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Responses to (Un)healthy advice: Processing and acceptance of health content creators’ nutrition misinformation by youth — Desirée Schmuck, Darian Harff, et al. · Appetite (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS