INTRODUÇÃO AO ESTUDO HISTORIOGRÁFICO DO FASCISMO: CRÍTICA AO PONTO DE VISTA MARXISTA E À “TEORIA GERAL DO FASCISMO”

This work provides an introductory analysis of the fascist phenomenon through a detailed historiographical study, with a special focus on comparing the “Marxist” perspective and the “general theory of fascism.” The relevance of this study is particularly evident in the current context, where the term “fascism” is often used in an imprecise and sometimes biased manner to discredit political opponents. This incorrect and occasionally political usage contributes to a vague and variable definition of the fascist phenomenon. The work seeks to define fascism based on the main dominant interpretative currents, examining the limitations and weaknesses of these analyses. Additionally, the research proposes a more robust and precise conceptualization of fascism, grounded in a rigorous historiographical approach aimed at providing a clearer and more well-founded understanding of the phenomenon. This approach intends to contribute to a more informed and less polarized debate about fascism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
COLLOQUIUM SOCIALIS
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5747/cs.2024.v8.s181
Primary Topic
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTRODUÇÃO AO ESTUDO HISTORIOGRÁFICO DO FASCISMO: CRÍTICA AO PONTO DE VISTA MARXISTA E À “TEORIA GERAL DO FASCISMO”

Lucas Ferreira Furlan, Julio César Puro Feitosa
COLLOQUIUM SOCIALIS
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
article

INTRODUÇÃO AO ESTUDO HISTORIOGRÁFICO DO FASCISMO: CRÍTICA AO PONTO DE VISTA MARXISTA E À “TEORIA GERAL DO FASCISMO”

Lucas Ferreira Furlan, Julio César Puro Feitosa
article en

Abstract

This work provides an introductory analysis of the fascist phenomenon through a detailed historiographical study, with a special focus on comparing the “Marxist” perspective and the “general theory of fascism.” The relevance of this study is particularly evident in the current context, where the term “fascism” is often used in an imprecise and sometimes biased manner to discredit political opponents. This incorrect and occasionally political usage contributes to a vague and variable definition of the fascist phenomenon. The work seeks to define fascism based on the main dominant interpretative currents, examining the limitations and weaknesses of these analyses. Additionally, the research proposes a more robust and precise conceptualization of fascism, grounded in a rigorous historiographical approach aimed at providing a clearer and more well-founded understanding of the phenomenon. This approach intends to contribute to a more informed and less polarized debate about fascism.

COLLOQUIUM SOCIALISVol. 8(1)
Universidade do Oeste Paulista (BR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.