Taper-Angle-Induced Variation in n/p-Stacked Versus p/n-Stacked CFET

The complementary field-effect transistor (CFET), comprising vertically stacked gate-all-around field-effect transistor (GAAFETs), is a promising candidate to significantly enhance the layout area beyond GAAFETs. However, due to its more than double the height compared to GAAFETs, CFET is more susceptible to taper angle, resulting in notable performance disparities between p-type and n-type GAAFETs. Using 3-D technology computer-aided design (TCAD), we compare CFET to standard CMOS comprising GAAFETs from device performance variation perspective. Regarding taper angle, the top GAAFET in CFET exhibits minor degradation in subthreshold swing (SS) and drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL), similar to GAAFETs in standard CMOS. In contrast, the bottom GAAFET in CFET shows substantial degradation, unlike standard CMOS and the top GAAFET in CFET. Therefore, since p-type and n-type GAAFETs are differently affected by taper angle depending on whether they are located at the top or the bottom in CFET, this article investigates the performance variations of inverter, NAND, and NOR gates based on the vertical positions of the GAAFETs. When n-type GAAFET is positioned at the bottom of CFET and taper angle increases to 4°, the inverter’s delay time varies by 2%p, dynamic power varies 5.6%p, and static power varies 73.4%p compared to when p-type GAAFET with poor performance is located at the bottom of CFET. Additionally, the two-input NAND and NOR gates showed more immunity to variations induced by taper angle when the n-type GAAFET is positioned at the bottom of CFET. This investigation led to the optimization of CFET structure to minimize performance variation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ted.2024.3506499
Citations
8
Primary Topic
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taper-Angle-Induced Variation in n/p-Stacked Versus p/n-Stacked CFET

Changhwan Shin, Eungyo Jang, M KIM
8 citations
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
3.91
article

Taper-Angle-Induced Variation in n/p-Stacked Versus p/n-Stacked CFET

Changhwan Shin, Eungyo Jang, M KIM
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The complementary field-effect transistor (CFET), comprising vertically stacked gate-all-around field-effect transistor (GAAFETs), is a promising candidate to significantly enhance the layout area beyond GAAFETs. However, due to its more than double the height compared to GAAFETs, CFET is more susceptible to taper angle, resulting in notable performance disparities between p-type and n-type GAAFETs. Using 3-D technology computer-aided design (TCAD), we compare CFET to standard CMOS comprising GAAFETs from device performance variation perspective. Regarding taper angle, the top GAAFET in CFET exhibits minor degradation in subthreshold swing (SS) and drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL), similar to GAAFETs in standard CMOS. In contrast, the bottom GAAFET in CFET shows substantial degradation, unlike standard CMOS and the top GAAFET in CFET. Therefore, since p-type and n-type GAAFETs are differently affected by taper angle depending on whether they are located at the top or the bottom in CFET, this article investigates the performance variations of inverter, NAND, and NOR gates based on the vertical positions of the GAAFETs. When n-type GAAFET is positioned at the bottom of CFET and taper angle increases to 4°, the inverter’s delay time varies by 2%p, dynamic power varies 5.6%p, and static power varies 73.4%p compared to when p-type GAAFET with poor performance is located at the bottom of CFET. Additionally, the two-input NAND and NOR gates showed more immunity to variations induced by taper angle when the n-type GAAFET is positioned at the bottom of CFET. This investigation led to the optimization of CFET structure to minimize performance variation.

IEEE Transactions on Electron DevicesVol. 72(1)
Korea University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.