Interaction and collision of moral and legal norms in the process of anti-corruption measures implementation: natural and actual aspects

Purpose This paper explores the dynamics between moral and legal frameworks in the context of anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine, particularly under martial law. This study aims to provide a detailed characterisation of how these norms interact and sometimes conflict during the implementation of anti-corruption measures, examining both theoretical and practical aspects. Design/methodology/approach Selecting an appropriate and objective methodology is pivotal to the success of scholarly research. Indeed, it is not merely the choice of specific methods that prove crucial, but rather their skilful integration and systematic application sequence that determines the quality of investigation. To achieve the stated objectives, this research employs a comprehensive system of scientific inquiry methods, applied in a precise sequence aligned with the logic of academic exploration. Findings This paper endeavours to elucidate the fundamental nature of corruption, scrutinises the intrinsic characteristics of moral and legal norms and evaluates their consequential impact on the efficacy of anti-corruption reforms. The research has identified their intricate interrelationships and emergent conflicting attributes through a rigorous comparative analysis of moral and legal norms. The authors conducted research contemporaneously with the implementation of anti-corruption reforms and ongoing military operations in Ukraine. It proposes to harness specific ramifications of the conflict to foster enhanced legal cognisance and cultural awareness, aiming to augment their practical application within the framework of extant anti-corruption initiatives. Originality/value The research’s novel contribution lies in its juxtaposition of moral and legal norms, elucidating their complex interplay and points of contention. It subsequently proposes juridical measures designed to recalibrate individual moral paradigms, whereby the collective welfare of the state assumes precedence over personal interests. Specifically, the research advocates for leveraging the phenomenon of national cohesion precipitated by the conflict to facilitate the implementation and execution of anti-corruption measures, instituting systematic and enduring anti-corruption educational programmes and broadening the conceptualisation of leadership through the assimilation of the “Tone at the top” approach.