Quantitative Classification of Spring Discharge Patterns: A Cluster Analysis Approach

ABSTRACT Springs provide critical water resources that are sensitive to changing climate and catchment processes. In many regions, understanding the temporal variability and spatial distribution of spring discharge is therefore crucial for sustainable water management. Knowledge of these discharge characteristics, organised in a coherent framework, is essential for protecting spring water and preventing shortages. To establish such a framework, we conducted a comparative analysis of long‐term discharge records from 96 springs across Austria. Based on discharge seasonality and autocorrelation, we derived a broad‐scale classification through cluster analysis and explored associations between individual clusters. The identified similarities in discharge patterns were grouped into four distinct spring categories, each demonstrating common behaviour. To determine the main factors influencing discharge across these four groups, we compared their spatial and temporal patterns with regional climate and catchment characteristics. They align with physical drivers of spring discharge, including precipitation frequency and intensity, snow cover duration, and dominant aquifer type. As these factors were not included in the classification procedure, their alignment supports the validity of our statistical approach. We conclude that the quantitative information derived from this analysis provides a valuable complement to traditional spring classification schemes, which are often based on qualitative knowledge. Our proposed strategy refines these classification approaches, enhances objectivity and reproducibility, and promotes conformity across hydrological disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15326
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Classification of Spring Discharge Patterns: A Cluster Analysis Approach

Jutta Eybl, Matevž Vremec, Heike Brielmann, Simon Seelig et al.
3 citations
Hydrological Processes
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.60
article

Quantitative Classification of Spring Discharge Patterns: A Cluster Analysis Approach

Jutta Eybl, Matevž Vremec, Heike Brielmann, Simon Seelig, Magdalena Seelig, Gerfried Winkler, Thomas Wagner
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Springs provide critical water resources that are sensitive to changing climate and catchment processes. In many regions, understanding the temporal variability and spatial distribution of spring discharge is therefore crucial for sustainable water management. Knowledge of these discharge characteristics, organised in a coherent framework, is essential for protecting spring water and preventing shortages. To establish such a framework, we conducted a comparative analysis of long‐term discharge records from 96 springs across Austria. Based on discharge seasonality and autocorrelation, we derived a broad‐scale classification through cluster analysis and explored associations between individual clusters. The identified similarities in discharge patterns were grouped into four distinct spring categories, each demonstrating common behaviour. To determine the main factors influencing discharge across these four groups, we compared their spatial and temporal patterns with regional climate and catchment characteristics. They align with physical drivers of spring discharge, including precipitation frequency and intensity, snow cover duration, and dominant aquifer type. As these factors were not included in the classification procedure, their alignment supports the validity of our statistical approach. We conclude that the quantitative information derived from this analysis provides a valuable complement to traditional spring classification schemes, which are often based on qualitative knowledge. Our proposed strategy refines these classification approaches, enhances objectivity and reproducibility, and promotes conformity across hydrological disciplines.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 38(12)
University of Graz (AT), Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (AT), Environment Agency Austria (AT), Nawi Graz (AT)
Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.