Experimental, economic, and life cycle carbon footprint assessment of low‐cost adsorbents for siloxane removal from landfill gas

Abstract Siloxane impurities in landfill gas (LFG) pose a significant challenge for downstream processing equipment used in energy recovery. This study investigated the adsorption capacity, cost, and environmental impact of five low‐cost adsorbent materials: biochar, clinoptilolite, hydrochar, diatomaceous‐earth, and crushed glass. Gravimetric analysis was used to determine the adsorption capacity of these materials for octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4). The results were then used to conduct a technoeconomic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA), comparing the selected adsorbents with activated carbon (AC), a commonly used adsorbent for siloxane removal. The TEA revealed that the cost of LFG purification with clinoptilolite, biochar, and AC was $0.035, $0.034, and $0.033/m 3 , respectively, for the base case studied. The cradle‐to‐gate LCA showed that clinoptilolite had significantly lower carbon emissions compared with the other adsorbents, both per kg of D4 captured and per kg of adsorbent produced. The potential fate of siloxanes after adsorption was discussed, emphasizing the importance of proper treatment and disposal of spent adsorbents. Surface modification techniques were recommended to enhance the adsorption capacity and regeneration of clinoptilolite, potentially reducing cost and carbon emissions in LFG purification. These findings highlight the potential of low‐cost adsorbents for sustainable LFG purification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.14534
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental, economic, and life cycle carbon footprint assessment of low‐cost adsorbents for siloxane removal from landfill gas

Rarosue J. Amaraibi, Babu Joseph, Bruce E Reynolds, John N. Kuhn
3 citations
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
0.53
article

Experimental, economic, and life cycle carbon footprint assessment of low‐cost adsorbents for siloxane removal from landfill gas

Rarosue J. Amaraibi, Babu Joseph, Bruce E Reynolds, John N. Kuhn
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Siloxane impurities in landfill gas (LFG) pose a significant challenge for downstream processing equipment used in energy recovery. This study investigated the adsorption capacity, cost, and environmental impact of five low‐cost adsorbent materials: biochar, clinoptilolite, hydrochar, diatomaceous‐earth, and crushed glass. Gravimetric analysis was used to determine the adsorption capacity of these materials for octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4). The results were then used to conduct a technoeconomic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA), comparing the selected adsorbents with activated carbon (AC), a commonly used adsorbent for siloxane removal. The TEA revealed that the cost of LFG purification with clinoptilolite, biochar, and AC was $0.035, $0.034, and $0.033/m 3 , respectively, for the base case studied. The cradle‐to‐gate LCA showed that clinoptilolite had significantly lower carbon emissions compared with the other adsorbents, both per kg of D4 captured and per kg of adsorbent produced. The potential fate of siloxanes after adsorption was discussed, emphasizing the importance of proper treatment and disposal of spent adsorbents. Surface modification techniques were recommended to enhance the adsorption capacity and regeneration of clinoptilolite, potentially reducing cost and carbon emissions in LFG purification. These findings highlight the potential of low‐cost adsorbents for sustainable LFG purification.

Environmental Progress & Sustainable EnergyVol. 44(1)
University of South Florida (US)
National Science Foundation, Environmental Research and Education Foundation, University of South Florida, Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.