State “Pandemic Pods”: US regional coalitions and their responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic

Abstract As the COVID‐19 pandemic began to unfold in the late winter and early spring of 2020, US states began to work collaboratively in regional coalitions to manage a rapidly developing public health crisis. These coalitions were made up of states that were geographically contiguous and, more importantly, built upon previous working relationships. We explore two regional coalitions—the Multistate Council and the Western States Pact in the northeast and western United States, respectively. We find that these regional coalitions each drew from institutional memory‐previous collaborative policies—to craft their collective COVID‐19 responses and that this approach produced two different outcomes. While these regional coalitions urgently provided critical resources (including institutional knowledge) to respond to the spreading pandemic, it may have also reflected a limit of institutional memory—path dependency which limited the regional coalitions' abilities to learn from each other and experience the benefits of other coalition approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12323
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State “Pandemic Pods”: US regional coalitions and their responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic

Christine Kirchhoff, Chesney McOmber
1 citations
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Employment and Welfare Studies
0.85
article

State “Pandemic Pods”: US regional coalitions and their responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic

Christine Kirchhoff, Chesney McOmber
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract As the COVID‐19 pandemic began to unfold in the late winter and early spring of 2020, US states began to work collaboratively in regional coalitions to manage a rapidly developing public health crisis. These coalitions were made up of states that were geographically contiguous and, more importantly, built upon previous working relationships. We explore two regional coalitions—the Multistate Council and the Western States Pact in the northeast and western United States, respectively. We find that these regional coalitions each drew from institutional memory‐previous collaborative policies—to craft their collective COVID‐19 responses and that this approach produced two different outcomes. While these regional coalitions urgently provided critical resources (including institutional knowledge) to respond to the spreading pandemic, it may have also reflected a limit of institutional memory—path dependency which limited the regional coalitions' abilities to learn from each other and experience the benefits of other coalition approaches.

Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public PolicyVol. 16(2)
University of Connecticut (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Connecticut, Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation, Division of Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Employment and Welfare Studies
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

State “Pandemic Pods”: US regional coalitions and their responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic — Christine Kirchhoff, Chesney McOmber · Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS