Comparative evaluation of the quality of life of patients after mastectomy and non-flapped breast reconstructions for cancer

Purpose of the study: to compare the quality of life of patients who underwent mastectomy and non-flapped breast reconstructions for cancer. The study included 90 patients, diagnosed with breast cancer 0–IIA st. T 1–2 N 0 M 0 . The minimum age of the patients was 30 years old, the maximum was 65 years, the average age was (49.76 ± 8.54) years old. Patients were divided into three groups of 30 women depending on the type of surgical treatment of the tumor and breast reconstruction: 1st group – Madden surgery with a subsectoral expander installation and replacement with a silicone endoprosthesis, 2nd group – Madden surgery with prepectoral expander installation, staged lipofilling and replacement with silicone endoprosthesis, 3rd group – radical subcutaneous mastectomy with one-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction. The quality of life was assessed using a set of Breast-Q scales. The data obtained make it possible to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of subcutaneous mastectomy with one-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction according to the method proposed by the authors due to the tendency to a more intensive increase of the quality of life of patients at the stages of rehabilitation in such aspects as psychosocial, physical and sexual well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/90/09
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of the quality of life of patients after mastectomy and non-flapped breast reconstructions for cancer

Samvel Vladimirovich Petrosyants, Р. А. Пахомова, D. N. Rovenskikh, Dmitry Vladimirovich Ivanov et al.
Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Comparative evaluation of the quality of life of patients after mastectomy and non-flapped breast reconstructions for cancer

Samvel Vladimirovich Petrosyants, Р. А. Пахомова, D. N. Rovenskikh, Dmitry Vladimirovich Ivanov, A. N. Aydemirov
article en

Abstract

Purpose of the study: to compare the quality of life of patients who underwent mastectomy and non-flapped breast reconstructions for cancer. The study included 90 patients, diagnosed with breast cancer 0–IIA st. T 1–2 N 0 M 0 . The minimum age of the patients was 30 years old, the maximum was 65 years, the average age was (49.76 ± 8.54) years old. Patients were divided into three groups of 30 women depending on the type of surgical treatment of the tumor and breast reconstruction: 1st group – Madden surgery with a subsectoral expander installation and replacement with a silicone endoprosthesis, 2nd group – Madden surgery with prepectoral expander installation, staged lipofilling and replacement with silicone endoprosthesis, 3rd group – radical subcutaneous mastectomy with one-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction. The quality of life was assessed using a set of Breast-Q scales. The data obtained make it possible to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of subcutaneous mastectomy with one-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction according to the method proposed by the authors due to the tendency to a more intensive increase of the quality of life of patients at the stages of rehabilitation in such aspects as psychosocial, physical and sexual well-being.

Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic SurgeryVol. 27(3)
Novosibirsk State University (RU), Euromedic (PL), Stavropol State Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.