Moving beyond “believers vs. deniers” labels: a public response-centered framework for energy justice in the emerging renewable energy sector

The global shift toward renewable energy raises concerns that the legacy of energy injustice—historical imbalances in the distribution of benefits and burdens from fossil fuels—may persist within renewable systems intended to address climate change. Current research highlights that energy injustice could threaten the success of this transition, yet limited focus has been placed on understanding public responses to these emerging injustices. Existing frameworks often reduce public opinion to simplistic binaries (for example, “supporters vs. opponents”), which fail to capture the nuanced and diverse perspectives necessary for a comprehensive understanding of public sentiment on energy issues. To address this, we introduce the “PARO framework,” a novel tool that categorizes public responses to energy injustice within the renewable energy context. The PARO framework broadens the analytical lens on public opinion, offering insights that can guide more targeted and effective solutions for promoting equitable energy transitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsuep.2024.1469707
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving beyond “believers vs. deniers” labels: a public response-centered framework for energy justice in the emerging renewable energy sector

Kalim U. Shah, Idowu O. Kunlere
2 citations
Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
2.26
article

Moving beyond “believers vs. deniers” labels: a public response-centered framework for energy justice in the emerging renewable energy sector

Kalim U. Shah, Idowu O. Kunlere
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The global shift toward renewable energy raises concerns that the legacy of energy injustice—historical imbalances in the distribution of benefits and burdens from fossil fuels—may persist within renewable systems intended to address climate change. Current research highlights that energy injustice could threaten the success of this transition, yet limited focus has been placed on understanding public responses to these emerging injustices. Existing frameworks often reduce public opinion to simplistic binaries (for example, “supporters vs. opponents”), which fail to capture the nuanced and diverse perspectives necessary for a comprehensive understanding of public sentiment on energy issues. To address this, we introduce the “PARO framework,” a novel tool that categorizes public responses to energy injustice within the renewable energy context. The PARO framework broadens the analytical lens on public opinion, offering insights that can guide more targeted and effective solutions for promoting equitable energy transitions.

Frontiers in Sustainable Energy PolicyVol. 3
University of Delaware (US)
Affordable and clean energy, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.