Collaboration for social‐ecological restoration: reflections from literature and practice

Collaboration is critical for engaging stakeholders and integrating diverse knowledges in social‐ecological restoration. Yet, despite the recognized benefits, ecosystem restoration has often not been collaborative across social and ecological disciplines or across different stakeholder scales. Drawing on relevant literature and practice‐based knowledge derived from our respective experiences working on the restoration of Indonesia's tropical peatlands, we emphasize the need for equitable task distribution; mutually beneficial, trust‐based relationships; inclusive and safe collaborative environments; scrutinizing and redressing power inequalities; establishing a shared understanding of, and vision for, social‐ecological contexts targeted for restoration; meeting on‐site and engaging with place‐based knowledge; and centering Indigenous and local knowledge. Putting in place these interconnected elements can contribute to a more integrated, equitable, adapted, sustained, and impactful collaboration for social‐ecological restoration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14355
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaboration for social‐ecological restoration: reflections from literature and practice

Tessa Toumbourou, Dony Rachmanadi, Niken Sakuntaladewi, Tri Wira Yuwati et al.
3 citations
Restoration Ecology
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
0.85
article

Collaboration for social‐ecological restoration: reflections from literature and practice

Tessa Toumbourou, Dony Rachmanadi, Niken Sakuntaladewi, Tri Wira Yuwati, Sarah Treby, Sri Lestari, Kushartati Budiningsih, Andrea Rawluk, Bondan Winarno, Samantha Grover, Nafila I. Idrus
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Collaboration is critical for engaging stakeholders and integrating diverse knowledges in social‐ecological restoration. Yet, despite the recognized benefits, ecosystem restoration has often not been collaborative across social and ecological disciplines or across different stakeholder scales. Drawing on relevant literature and practice‐based knowledge derived from our respective experiences working on the restoration of Indonesia's tropical peatlands, we emphasize the need for equitable task distribution; mutually beneficial, trust‐based relationships; inclusive and safe collaborative environments; scrutinizing and redressing power inequalities; establishing a shared understanding of, and vision for, social‐ecological contexts targeted for restoration; meeting on‐site and engaging with place‐based knowledge; and centering Indigenous and local knowledge. Putting in place these interconnected elements can contribute to a more integrated, equitable, adapted, sustained, and impactful collaboration for social‐ecological restoration.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(3)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Center for Plant Conservation (US), Ministry of Education and Culture (ID), Ecosystem Sciences (AU), National Research and Innovation Agency (ID), RMIT University (AU), KU Leuven (BE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.