Internal Crisis Communication in Hospitals the Choice of Communication Channels and Its Impact on Effectiveness

ABSTRACT The COVID‐19 pandemic has highlighted the need for effective internal crisis communication (ICC) in hospitals. However, only little is known about how the choice of communication channels influences the effectiveness of ICC. Our case study offers novel insights into this relationship. We performed an in‐depth analysis of ICC during the COVID‐19 pandemic at a Norwegian tertiary public hospital. We conducted 22 in‐depth interviews with stakeholders from various hierarchical levels who actively participated in ICC. We mapped the relationships of the actors involved in ICC and performed a social network analysis. The emergency reorganization of the hospital made ICC processes more complex compared to the ordinary line structure of communication, and on lower hierarchical levels several redundant (and not necessarily officially approved) communication channels were used. Moreover, we found that the effectiveness of ICC was reduced by communication channels with speed and bandwidth limits. In contrast, communication channels with a high capability to transmit contextualized information improved the effectiveness of ICC. Since our case hospital shares common characteristics with many other tertiary public hospitals, including fragmentation of responsibilities during crisis response, we use our results as a basis for recommending appropriate communication channels and avoiding a decoupling of ICC between hierarchical levels and professions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.70008
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Internal Crisis Communication in Hospitals the Choice of Communication Channels and Its Impact on Effectiveness

Joachim Scholderer, Tor Kristian Stevik, Hendrik Winzer
3 citations
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
2.87
article

Internal Crisis Communication in Hospitals the Choice of Communication Channels and Its Impact on Effectiveness

Joachim Scholderer, Tor Kristian Stevik, Hendrik Winzer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The COVID‐19 pandemic has highlighted the need for effective internal crisis communication (ICC) in hospitals. However, only little is known about how the choice of communication channels influences the effectiveness of ICC. Our case study offers novel insights into this relationship. We performed an in‐depth analysis of ICC during the COVID‐19 pandemic at a Norwegian tertiary public hospital. We conducted 22 in‐depth interviews with stakeholders from various hierarchical levels who actively participated in ICC. We mapped the relationships of the actors involved in ICC and performed a social network analysis. The emergency reorganization of the hospital made ICC processes more complex compared to the ordinary line structure of communication, and on lower hierarchical levels several redundant (and not necessarily officially approved) communication channels were used. Moreover, we found that the effectiveness of ICC was reduced by communication channels with speed and bandwidth limits. In contrast, communication channels with a high capability to transmit contextualized information improved the effectiveness of ICC. Since our case hospital shares common characteristics with many other tertiary public hospitals, including fragmentation of responsibilities during crisis response, we use our results as a basis for recommending appropriate communication channels and avoiding a decoupling of ICC between hierarchical levels and professions.

Journal of Contingencies and Crisis ManagementVol. 32(4)
Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
2.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.