Nurses’ opinions on midline catheters: a single-centre study of subjective experiences and training needs

Abstract Aim. The aim of this study is to assess nurses’ opinions on the usability, effectiveness, and benefits of midline catheters (MC) in nursing practice. Additionally, the study identifies nurses’ subjective knowledge levels and training needs related to these catheters. Material and methods. A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted from 15th October to 15th November 2023, involving 127 nurses from various departments. Data were collected through an anonymous survey with 13 questions about opinions on MC, subjective knowledge, and sociodemographic metrics. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics. Results. Most nurses had experience with patients using midline catheters, and the average rating of opinions on MC was 4.44 on a Likert scale (1-5). The average subjective knowledge about MC was 4.26. A total of 88% of respondents desired future training on MC, and 72% wanted to learn how to insert these catheters. Nurses who attended training rated their preparedness to handle MCs higher. Conclusions. Midline catheters are well-regarded by nurses and integral to their practice. Regular training and support are essential for effectively implementing new medical technologies. Investing in medical staff education is crucial for improving healthcare quality and patient safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/pielxxiw-2024-0035
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nurses’ opinions on midline catheters: a single-centre study of subjective experiences and training needs

Dariusz Kosson, Agata Hanna Bryk, Grzegorz Cichowlas, Anna Gąsior
1 citations
Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
0.74
article

Nurses’ opinions on midline catheters: a single-centre study of subjective experiences and training needs

Dariusz Kosson, Agata Hanna Bryk, Grzegorz Cichowlas, Anna Gąsior
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aim. The aim of this study is to assess nurses’ opinions on the usability, effectiveness, and benefits of midline catheters (MC) in nursing practice. Additionally, the study identifies nurses’ subjective knowledge levels and training needs related to these catheters. Material and methods. A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted from 15th October to 15th November 2023, involving 127 nurses from various departments. Data were collected through an anonymous survey with 13 questions about opinions on MC, subjective knowledge, and sociodemographic metrics. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics. Results. Most nurses had experience with patients using midline catheters, and the average rating of opinions on MC was 4.44 on a Likert scale (1-5). The average subjective knowledge about MC was 4.26. A total of 88% of respondents desired future training on MC, and 72% wanted to learn how to insert these catheters. Nurses who attended training rated their preparedness to handle MCs higher. Conclusions. Midline catheters are well-regarded by nurses and integral to their practice. Regular training and support are essential for effectively implementing new medical technologies. Investing in medical staff education is crucial for improving healthcare quality and patient safety.

Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century
Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
0.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.