Using TOPSIS Method for Solving Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-stage Helical Gearbox with First Stage Double Gear-sets

In order to build a two-stage helical gearbox (THG) with first stage double gear-sets (FSDG), the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method is introduced in this research as a new approach to solving the multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP). The study's objective is to deter-mine the best primary design factors that simultaneously satisfy two goals: maximal gearbox ef-ficiency and minimal gearbox mass. To that end, the first stage's gear ratio and the first and sec-ond stages' CWFW were chosen as the three main design elements. Furthermore, two distinct goals were analyzed: the lowest gearbox mass and the highest gearbox efficiency. Additionally, the MOOP is carried out in two steps: phase 1 solves the single-objective optimization problem to close the gap between variable levels, and phase 2 solves the MOOP to determine the optimal primary design factors. Furthermore, the TOPSIS approach was selected to address the MOOP problem. For the first time, an MCDM technique is used to solve the MOOP of a helical gearbox with FSDG. Additionally, this is the first investigation of the total gearbox efficiency, which includes the power losses during idle. When designing the gearbox, the optimal values for three crucial design parameters were ascertained using the study's results.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Machine Engineering
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36897/jme/196771
Primary Topic
Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using TOPSIS Method for Solving Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-stage Helical Gearbox with First Stage Double Gear-sets

Duong Vu, Tran Huu Danh, Vu Ngoc Pi, Van-Thanh Dinh et al.
Journal of Machine Engineering
Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
article

Using TOPSIS Method for Solving Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-stage Helical Gearbox with First Stage Double Gear-sets

Duong Vu, Tran Huu Danh, Vu Ngoc Pi, Van-Thanh Dinh, Duc-Binh Vu, Tung Anh Luu
article en

Abstract

In order to build a two-stage helical gearbox (THG) with first stage double gear-sets (FSDG), the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method is introduced in this research as a new approach to solving the multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP). The study's objective is to deter-mine the best primary design factors that simultaneously satisfy two goals: maximal gearbox ef-ficiency and minimal gearbox mass. To that end, the first stage's gear ratio and the first and sec-ond stages' CWFW were chosen as the three main design elements. Furthermore, two distinct goals were analyzed: the lowest gearbox mass and the highest gearbox efficiency. Additionally, the MOOP is carried out in two steps: phase 1 solves the single-objective optimization problem to close the gap between variable levels, and phase 2 solves the MOOP to determine the optimal primary design factors. Furthermore, the TOPSIS approach was selected to address the MOOP problem. For the first time, an MCDM technique is used to solve the MOOP of a helical gearbox with FSDG. Additionally, this is the first investigation of the total gearbox efficiency, which includes the power losses during idle. When designing the gearbox, the optimal values for three crucial design parameters were ascertained using the study's results.

Journal of Machine EngineeringVol. 24(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.