Poster: Do Privacy-Preserving Obfuscation Techniques Degrade the Accuracy of Odometry?

On-device sensors in mobile systems, e.g., autonomous vehicles and AR/VR, use odometry for real-time positioning, but they risk capturing sensitive data of non-consenting bystanders. Prior works have investigated various privacy-preserving techniques to protect those sensitive data. However, it is still unclear about the impact of such approaches on the accuracy of odometry. In this work, we investigate the impact of various privacy-preserving obfuscation techniques on the accuracy of monocular visual odometry. We focus on three widely used obfuscation methods: Gaussian Blur, Gaussian Noise, and Laplacian Noise, applied to protect bystander privacy. Our investigation reveals that some obfuscation techniques can increase the odometry errors by up to 56.9%, while others surprisingly reduce the errors by up to 66.8%, compared to raw data. Our key findings indicate that data obfuscation primarily affects the duration of tracking loss in ORB-SLAM3, which is the main source of the errors, and successful relocalization immediately following tracking loss plays a crucial role in reducing the overall errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3636534.3697459
Primary Topic
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster: Do Privacy-Preserving Obfuscation Techniques Degrade the Accuracy of Odometry?

Nahin Kumar Dey, Faysal Hossain Shezan, Jiayi Meng, Nikolaos Ntokos
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
article

Poster: Do Privacy-Preserving Obfuscation Techniques Degrade the Accuracy of Odometry?

Nahin Kumar Dey, Faysal Hossain Shezan, Jiayi Meng, Nikolaos Ntokos
article en

Abstract

On-device sensors in mobile systems, e.g., autonomous vehicles and AR/VR, use odometry for real-time positioning, but they risk capturing sensitive data of non-consenting bystanders. Prior works have investigated various privacy-preserving techniques to protect those sensitive data. However, it is still unclear about the impact of such approaches on the accuracy of odometry. In this work, we investigate the impact of various privacy-preserving obfuscation techniques on the accuracy of monocular visual odometry. We focus on three widely used obfuscation methods: Gaussian Blur, Gaussian Noise, and Laplacian Noise, applied to protect bystander privacy. Our investigation reveals that some obfuscation techniques can increase the odometry errors by up to 56.9%, while others surprisingly reduce the errors by up to 66.8%, compared to raw data. Our key findings indicate that data obfuscation primarily affects the duration of tracking loss in ORB-SLAM3, which is the main source of the errors, and successful relocalization immediately following tracking loss plays a crucial role in reducing the overall errors.

The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Poster: Do Privacy-Preserving Obfuscation Techniques Degrade the Accuracy of Odometry? — Nahin Kumar Dey, Faysal Hossain Shezan, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS