Monitoring of greenhouse gas emissions and compost quality during olive mill waste co-composting at industrial scale: The effect of N and C sources
Olive mill wastes (OMW) management by composting allows to obtain valuable fertilizing products, but also implies significant fluxes of greenhouse gases (GHG). For a proper OMW composting, high C- and N co-substrates are necessary, but little is known concerning their effect on GHG emissions in OMW-industrial scale composting. In this study, different co-composting agents (cattle manure (CM), poultry manure (PM), sheep manure (SM) and pig slurry solid fraction (PSSF) as N sources and olive leaves (OLW) and urban pruning residues (UPR) as bulking agents and C sources) were used for OMW composting at industrial scale. Physico-chemical and chemical properties in the composting samples, and GHG (CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O) fluxes were monitored in 12 industrial-scale windrows. GHG emissions were firstly influenced by N source, with the highest accumulated global warming potential (GWP) associated with PM (512 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq pile<sup>-1</sup>), since PM composts were associated with the greatest N<sub>2</sub>O (0.33 kg pile<sup>-1</sup>) and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions (15.67 kg pile<sup>-1</sup>). Meanwhile, PSSF was associated with the highest CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (1113 kg pile<sup>-1</sup>). UPR as a bulking agent facilitated 10 % greater mineralization of the biomass than OLW, however this C-source was not associated with higher GHG emissions. The results showed that while mineralization dynamics may be impacted by C sources, GHG emissions were mainly conditioned by the characteristics of nutrient-heavy feedstocks (PM and SM). Moreover, manures as nitrogen-laden co-substrates had widely differing effects on total GWP, and that of individual gases, but further research is necessary to understand the mechanisms explaining such differences.
Authors
- E. Agulló
- Luciano Orden (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6435-5965)
- R. Moral (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4881-480X)
- M.D. Pérez-Murcia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0722-9599)
- M.A. Bustamante (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9931-1711)
- Encarnación Martínez‐Sabater (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5317-4157)
- Francisco Javier Andreu‐Rodríguez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-7333)
- Evan A.N. Marks (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2931-5976)
- Samuel Franco‐Luesma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1269-8664)
- Ana García-Rández
- José Antonio López Sáez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6581-4158)
- Maite Cháfer
Institutions
- Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES)
- Estación Experimental de Aula Dei (ES)
- Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Waste Management
- Published
- 2024-12-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.11.039
- Citations
- 21
- Primary Topic
- Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 7.01
Funders
- Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
- Generalitat Valenciana
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
- European Regional Development Fund
- Conselleria de Agricultura, Medio Ambiente, Cambio Climático y Desarrollo Rural, Generalitat Valenciana