Pengembangan Perangkat Penilaian Mandiri Budaya Keselamatan di Instalasi Nuklir

A study has been conducted to develop a self-assessment tool for safety culture that BAPETEN can use for nuclear installations in Indonesia. Safety culture is one of the safety and licensing requirements in nuclear energy laws and regulations. BAPETEN is also entrusted to conduct assessments and foster safety culture. BAPETEN has carried out these activities at BATAN nuclear installations from 2005 to 2012. As a follow-up, BATAN has taken various measures to evaluate and develop a safety culture at all its nuclear installations. In 2021, all Non-Ministerial Government Institutions in the research sector, including BATAN, were merged into one under the management of BRIN. This organizational change certainly has the potential to affect safety and safety culture performance. In practice, the results of inspections in the last two years have shown a tendency for an increase in the number of findings. BAPETEN has yet to have a documented, comprehensive method for assessing safety culture performance. Thus, this study aims to develop a documented and comprehensive method for assessing safety culture performance at nuclear installations. This study applies descriptive, qualitative, and analytical techniques, using primary and secondary data, and is conducted in several stages: literature study, presentation and discussion of information transfer and documentation from past practices, comparative study with a high-risk industry, safety culture assessment workshops, and review and validation. In conclusion, this study has produced safety culture assessment tools through a questionnaire survey, document analysis field observation, interviews, and focus groups. The four tools, which refer to the IAEA safety culture systematics with five characteristics, complement each other and can be expected to be comprehensive but realistic enough to be implemented. The study also recommends that an immediate assessment should be carried out using these four tools on the existing nuclear installations. At the end of the assessment, the assessment team should evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the four tools for improvement. Keywords: safety culture, independent assessment, nuclear installation

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Pengawasan Tenaga Nuklir
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53862/jupeten.v4i2.004
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pengembangan Perangkat Penilaian Mandiri Budaya Keselamatan di Instalasi Nuklir

Reno Alamsyah, Fibra Rhoma Firmanda, Anggoro Septilarso
Jurnal Pengawasan Tenaga Nuklir
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Pengembangan Perangkat Penilaian Mandiri Budaya Keselamatan di Instalasi Nuklir

Reno Alamsyah, Fibra Rhoma Firmanda, Anggoro Septilarso
article en

Abstract

A study has been conducted to develop a self-assessment tool for safety culture that BAPETEN can use for nuclear installations in Indonesia. Safety culture is one of the safety and licensing requirements in nuclear energy laws and regulations. BAPETEN is also entrusted to conduct assessments and foster safety culture. BAPETEN has carried out these activities at BATAN nuclear installations from 2005 to 2012. As a follow-up, BATAN has taken various measures to evaluate and develop a safety culture at all its nuclear installations. In 2021, all Non-Ministerial Government Institutions in the research sector, including BATAN, were merged into one under the management of BRIN. This organizational change certainly has the potential to affect safety and safety culture performance. In practice, the results of inspections in the last two years have shown a tendency for an increase in the number of findings. BAPETEN has yet to have a documented, comprehensive method for assessing safety culture performance. Thus, this study aims to develop a documented and comprehensive method for assessing safety culture performance at nuclear installations. This study applies descriptive, qualitative, and analytical techniques, using primary and secondary data, and is conducted in several stages: literature study, presentation and discussion of information transfer and documentation from past practices, comparative study with a high-risk industry, safety culture assessment workshops, and review and validation. In conclusion, this study has produced safety culture assessment tools through a questionnaire survey, document analysis field observation, interviews, and focus groups. The four tools, which refer to the IAEA safety culture systematics with five characteristics, complement each other and can be expected to be comprehensive but realistic enough to be implemented. The study also recommends that an immediate assessment should be carried out using these four tools on the existing nuclear installations. At the end of the assessment, the assessment team should evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the four tools for improvement. Keywords: safety culture, independent assessment, nuclear installation

Jurnal Pengawasan Tenaga NuklirVol. 4(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pengembangan Perangkat Penilaian Mandiri Budaya Keselamatan di Instalasi Nuklir — Reno Alamsyah, Fibra Rhoma Firmanda, et al. · Jurnal Pengawasan Tenaga Nuklir (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS