Derivation and Validation of Prediction of Preterm Preeclampsia Using Machine Learning Algorithms

This study aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models for predicting preterm preeclampsia using the information available before 23 weeks gestation.This was a secondary analysis of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nuMoM2b) cohort. We considered 131 features available before 23 weeks including maternal demographics, obstetrics and family history, social determinants of health, physical activity, nutrition, and early second-trimester ultrasound. Our primary outcome was preterm preeclampsia before 37 weeks. The dataset was randomly split into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). ML models using glmnet, multilayer perceptron, random forest, XGBoost (extreme gradient boosting), and LightGBM models were developed. Using the ML approach that achieved the best area under the curve (AUC), we developed the final model. Further feature selection was conducted from the top 25 important features based on SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. The performance of the final model was assessed using the validation dataset.Of 9,467 individuals, 219 (2.3%) had preterm preeclampsia. The AUC of the XGBoost model was the highest (AUC = 0.749 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.736-0.762]) compared with other models. Therefore, XGBoost was used to develop models using fewer variables. The XGBoost model with the eight features (in order of importance: mean uterine artery pulsatility index in the early second trimester, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, uterine artery notch, systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the first trimester, body mass index, and maternal age) was chosen as the final model as it had an AUC of 0.741 (95% CI, 0.730-0.752) which was not inferior to the original model (<i>p</i> = 0.58). The final model in the validation dataset had an AUC of 0.779 (95% CI, 0.722-0.831). An online application of the final model was developed ( https://kawakita.shinyapps.io/Preterm_preeclampsia/ ).ML algorithms using information available before 23 weeks can accurately predict preterm preeclampsia before 37 weeks. · Prediction models using uterine artery Doppler have not been adopted in the US.. · We developed a model using an ML algorithm.. · An online application of the final model was developed.. · ML algorithms using information available before 23 weeks can accurately predict preterm preeclampsia before 37 weeks..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2495-3600
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Derivation and Validation of Prediction of Preterm Preeclampsia Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Yara Hage Diab, George A. Saade, Tetsuya Kawakita, Lea Nehme et al.
3 citations
American Journal of Perinatology
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
1.75
article

Derivation and Validation of Prediction of Preterm Preeclampsia Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Yara Hage Diab, George A. Saade, Tetsuya Kawakita, Lea Nehme, Juliana Gevaerd Martins
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models for predicting preterm preeclampsia using the information available before 23 weeks gestation.This was a secondary analysis of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nuMoM2b) cohort. We considered 131 features available before 23 weeks including maternal demographics, obstetrics and family history, social determinants of health, physical activity, nutrition, and early second-trimester ultrasound. Our primary outcome was preterm preeclampsia before 37 weeks. The dataset was randomly split into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). ML models using glmnet, multilayer perceptron, random forest, XGBoost (extreme gradient boosting), and LightGBM models were developed. Using the ML approach that achieved the best area under the curve (AUC), we developed the final model. Further feature selection was conducted from the top 25 important features based on SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. The performance of the final model was assessed using the validation dataset.Of 9,467 individuals, 219 (2.3%) had preterm preeclampsia. The AUC of the XGBoost model was the highest (AUC = 0.749 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.736-0.762]) compared with other models. Therefore, XGBoost was used to develop models using fewer variables. The XGBoost model with the eight features (in order of importance: mean uterine artery pulsatility index in the early second trimester, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, uterine artery notch, systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the first trimester, body mass index, and maternal age) was chosen as the final model as it had an AUC of 0.741 (95% CI, 0.730-0.752) which was not inferior to the original model (<i>p</i> = 0.58). The final model in the validation dataset had an AUC of 0.779 (95% CI, 0.722-0.831). An online application of the final model was developed ( https://kawakita.shinyapps.io/Preterm_preeclampsia/ ).ML algorithms using information available before 23 weeks can accurately predict preterm preeclampsia before 37 weeks. · Prediction models using uterine artery Doppler have not been adopted in the US.. · We developed a model using an ML algorithm.. · An online application of the final model was developed.. · ML algorithms using information available before 23 weeks can accurately predict preterm preeclampsia before 37 weeks..

American Journal of PerinatologyVol. 42(10)
Eastern Virginia Medical School (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Eastern Virginia Medical School
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.