Practical insights for ECa-based soil mapping: Case studies in croplands and vineyards

• Proximal geophysical methods optimize soil mapping in precision agriculture. • Reliable soil property estimation requires site-specific calibration via soil sampling. • Our method estimates soil properties with few sampling points selected from ECa maps. • These few sampling points effectively represent soil variability in studied fields. • Our study confirms strong correlation between ECa and soil texture. Mapping the within-field variability of soil properties is essential for precision agriculture. This work aims to develop an efficient approach to mapping soil properties using proximal geophysical methods, minimizing the number of soil sampling points required for the site-specific calibration of the soil parameter estimation models. Ten experimental fields in northern Italy were surveyed using geoelectric and electromagnetic induction methods to obtain maps of soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa). Soil samples (topsoil and subsoil) were collected following a dense regular grid and analysed to determine chemical and physical properties. For each field, the relationships between ECa and soil parameters were studied. The possibility of obtaining detailed maps of some soil parameters by using a reduced number of sampling points, selected on the basis of the ECa map, was then investigated. The Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) was used to assess the estimation error. The results showed that in our study sites ECa is mainly correlated with textural parameters. The MAPE trends indicated a low variability in the minimum number of sampling points across the study sites. At each field, the calibration model for estimating soil properties could be built with a limited number of sampling points, that are representative of its soil characteristics. Thus, the soil information collected at the few selected sampling points provides insights into the within-field variability of each soil parameter, giving an indication of whether it is worth continuing the process of detailed mapping, which occurs when the coefficient of variation of the parameter is medium to high.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100697
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical insights for ECa-based soil mapping: Case studies in croplands and vineyards

Chiara Ferré, Roberto Comolli, Camilla De Feudis
2 citations
Smart Agricultural Technology
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
0.41
article

Practical insights for ECa-based soil mapping: Case studies in croplands and vineyards

Chiara Ferré, Roberto Comolli, Camilla De Feudis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Proximal geophysical methods optimize soil mapping in precision agriculture. • Reliable soil property estimation requires site-specific calibration via soil sampling. • Our method estimates soil properties with few sampling points selected from ECa maps. • These few sampling points effectively represent soil variability in studied fields. • Our study confirms strong correlation between ECa and soil texture. Mapping the within-field variability of soil properties is essential for precision agriculture. This work aims to develop an efficient approach to mapping soil properties using proximal geophysical methods, minimizing the number of soil sampling points required for the site-specific calibration of the soil parameter estimation models. Ten experimental fields in northern Italy were surveyed using geoelectric and electromagnetic induction methods to obtain maps of soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa). Soil samples (topsoil and subsoil) were collected following a dense regular grid and analysed to determine chemical and physical properties. For each field, the relationships between ECa and soil parameters were studied. The possibility of obtaining detailed maps of some soil parameters by using a reduced number of sampling points, selected on the basis of the ECa map, was then investigated. The Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) was used to assess the estimation error. The results showed that in our study sites ECa is mainly correlated with textural parameters. The MAPE trends indicated a low variability in the minimum number of sampling points across the study sites. At each field, the calibration model for estimating soil properties could be built with a limited number of sampling points, that are representative of its soil characteristics. Thus, the soil information collected at the few selected sampling points provides insights into the within-field variability of each soil parameter, giving an indication of whether it is worth continuing the process of detailed mapping, which occurs when the coefficient of variation of the parameter is medium to high.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 10
University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.