Impact resistance of self-sensing engineered cementitious composite (ECC) under different temperatures

Self-sensing engineered cementitious composite (ECC) is inevitably susceptible to the effects of impact loads when it is applied to structural health monitoring. In this paper, the impact resistance of self-sensing ECC under varying temperatures was investigated by experiments. Specimens comprising cement mortar, conventional ECC, and self-sensing ECC, all featuring identical water-binder ratios, were prepared and subjected to compressive and tensile strength evaluations, as well as tensile ductility measurements. Subsequently, the drop-weight impact tests were conducted on these three specimens at the temperatures of −50℃, −30℃, −10℃, 20℃, 50℃ and 100℃, respectively. Detailed analyses were carried out on the resulting impact loads, impact durations, dent depths, and failure modes. Our findings reveal that the compressive strength of cement mortar surpasses that of both conventional ECC and self-sensing ECC. Furthermore, conventional ECC and self-sensing ECC exhibit ultimate tensile strains of 4.6 % and 6.7 %, respectively. At the same drop-height of impactor, the maximum impact force decreases with the increase of temperature. At cold temperature, the specimen exhibit heightened impact forces coupled with abbreviated impact durations. Self-sensing ECC demonstrates a decreased maximum impact force and an extended duration compared to conventional ECC. The cement mortar specimen shows brittle failure, while both self-sensing ECC and conventional ECC align with the scabbing failure mode. Self-sensing ECC with a smaller scabbing thickness has preferable impact resistance and deformability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04077
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Smart Materials for Construction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact resistance of self-sensing engineered cementitious composite (ECC) under different temperatures

Zhigang Song, Jinsheng Han, Jingming Cai, Guohui Zhang et al.
3 citations
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Smart Materials for Construction
0.40
article

Impact resistance of self-sensing engineered cementitious composite (ECC) under different temperatures

Zhigang Song, Jinsheng Han, Jingming Cai, Guohui Zhang, Jinlong Pan, Xinyu Shi, Peng Wang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Self-sensing engineered cementitious composite (ECC) is inevitably susceptible to the effects of impact loads when it is applied to structural health monitoring. In this paper, the impact resistance of self-sensing ECC under varying temperatures was investigated by experiments. Specimens comprising cement mortar, conventional ECC, and self-sensing ECC, all featuring identical water-binder ratios, were prepared and subjected to compressive and tensile strength evaluations, as well as tensile ductility measurements. Subsequently, the drop-weight impact tests were conducted on these three specimens at the temperatures of −50℃, −30℃, −10℃, 20℃, 50℃ and 100℃, respectively. Detailed analyses were carried out on the resulting impact loads, impact durations, dent depths, and failure modes. Our findings reveal that the compressive strength of cement mortar surpasses that of both conventional ECC and self-sensing ECC. Furthermore, conventional ECC and self-sensing ECC exhibit ultimate tensile strains of 4.6 % and 6.7 %, respectively. At the same drop-height of impactor, the maximum impact force decreases with the increase of temperature. At cold temperature, the specimen exhibit heightened impact forces coupled with abbreviated impact durations. Self-sensing ECC demonstrates a decreased maximum impact force and an extended duration compared to conventional ECC. The cement mortar specimen shows brittle failure, while both self-sensing ECC and conventional ECC align with the scabbing failure mode. Self-sensing ECC with a smaller scabbing thickness has preferable impact resistance and deformability.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 21
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Smart Materials for Construction
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.