EUPHEMISMS AND DYSPHEMISMS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF LINGUISTIC PRAGMATICS (based on contemporary Ukrainian literature)

The article analyzes the phenomena of euphemism and dysphemism based on the texts of contemporary Ukrainian authors. Given the current publishing trends, we observe an increase in the number of publications, particularly by novice authors, whose works contain defining features important for analysis. Fifteen novels have been analyzed, and the research concerning them allows us to assert that euphemization and dysphemization are characteristic phenomena of Ukrainian artistic discourse. Within the article, 287 euphemisms and 219 dysphemisms have been identified. Euphemisms and dysphemisms are defined as indirect speech acts (according to the theory and classification of J. Austin) and are studied within the framework of pragmatic linguistics. This approach enables a comprehensive analysis of the selected phenomena, as the use of implicatures as elements of hidden, additional, non-verbalized meaning is often traced, as well as presuppositions that refer to shared, already known information within the message.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Movoznavstvo
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33190/0027-2833-338-2024-5-004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EUPHEMISMS AND DYSPHEMISMS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF LINGUISTIC PRAGMATICS (based on contemporary Ukrainian literature)

Valentyna BALAZH
1 citations
Movoznavstvo
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
4.29
article

EUPHEMISMS AND DYSPHEMISMS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF LINGUISTIC PRAGMATICS (based on contemporary Ukrainian literature)

Valentyna BALAZH
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article analyzes the phenomena of euphemism and dysphemism based on the texts of contemporary Ukrainian authors. Given the current publishing trends, we observe an increase in the number of publications, particularly by novice authors, whose works contain defining features important for analysis. Fifteen novels have been analyzed, and the research concerning them allows us to assert that euphemization and dysphemization are characteristic phenomena of Ukrainian artistic discourse. Within the article, 287 euphemisms and 219 dysphemisms have been identified. Euphemisms and dysphemisms are defined as indirect speech acts (according to the theory and classification of J. Austin) and are studied within the framework of pragmatic linguistics. This approach enables a comprehensive analysis of the selected phenomena, as the use of implicatures as elements of hidden, additional, non-verbalized meaning is often traced, as well as presuppositions that refer to shared, already known information within the message.

MovoznavstvoVol. 338(5)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.