Phosphorus in Balance: Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of a Circular Economy Approach

This paper presents a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of producing alternative phosphorus (P) fertilizers from recycled water treatment residuals (Fe-WTR) and cowshed effluents. The cost-benefit values of Fe-WTR are compared to the net costs of recycling P using a synthetic adsorbent (commonly used practice-layered double hydroxide, P-LDH) and the costs of commercial fertilizers. Dairy wastewater is used as a source of P. The cost of 1 ton P using the Fe-WTR process is €329. In contrast, synthetic adsorbents (P-LDH) incur significantly higher costs, amounting to €3329 per ton, underscoring the economic advantage of utilizing waste-derived materials. Adopting Fe-WTR fertilizer not only offers substantial cost savings by avoiding landfill fees (€40 per ton) and wastewater discharge fines (€500 per ton) but also reduces environmental impacts when compared to the use of commercial P fertilizers (non-recycled P). The Fe-WTR method mitigates eutrophication and pollution, presenting the dual benefit of cost-effectiveness and environmental protection, which exceeds the common P recycling practice (LDH). Our conclusions are based on production processes in Israel and compared to previous cost estimations at the world level, assessing the potential gain from such circular production of P globally. Recycling P from waste streams can be economically viable and environmentally preferable at small and large economic scales, supporting global sustainability goals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Science Studies
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20849/jess.v7i2.1469
Primary Topic
Phosphorus and nutrient management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phosphorus in Balance: Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of a Circular Economy Approach

Dafna M. DiSegni, M. Iggy Litaor, Hasan E. Ganem, Adi Jonas-Levi et al.
Journal of Environmental Science Studies
Phosphorus and nutrient management
article

Phosphorus in Balance: Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of a Circular Economy Approach

Dafna M. DiSegni, M. Iggy Litaor, Hasan E. Ganem, Adi Jonas-Levi, Iris Zohar
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of producing alternative phosphorus (P) fertilizers from recycled water treatment residuals (Fe-WTR) and cowshed effluents. The cost-benefit values of Fe-WTR are compared to the net costs of recycling P using a synthetic adsorbent (commonly used practice-layered double hydroxide, P-LDH) and the costs of commercial fertilizers. Dairy wastewater is used as a source of P. The cost of 1 ton P using the Fe-WTR process is €329. In contrast, synthetic adsorbents (P-LDH) incur significantly higher costs, amounting to €3329 per ton, underscoring the economic advantage of utilizing waste-derived materials. Adopting Fe-WTR fertilizer not only offers substantial cost savings by avoiding landfill fees (€40 per ton) and wastewater discharge fines (€500 per ton) but also reduces environmental impacts when compared to the use of commercial P fertilizers (non-recycled P). The Fe-WTR method mitigates eutrophication and pollution, presenting the dual benefit of cost-effectiveness and environmental protection, which exceeds the common P recycling practice (LDH). Our conclusions are based on production processes in Israel and compared to previous cost estimations at the world level, assessing the potential gain from such circular production of P globally. Recycling P from waste streams can be economically viable and environmentally preferable at small and large economic scales, supporting global sustainability goals.

Journal of Environmental Science Studies
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Phosphorus and nutrient management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.