Endings -s and -st in the 2nd Person Singular Present Indicative in Old English

Abstract The replacement of the ending - s with - st in the 2nd person singular present indicative is an often-discussed diachronic development in Old English. Whereas most accounts center on the origins of - st , the present study focuses on the competition between the two endings throughout the Old English period. The current examination of the witnesses dating between the ninth and eleventh centuries shows that the - s - and - st -forms did not contrast on the phonological and morphological features generally cited in the analyses of this change. The adjacency of the pronominal subject did not affect the choice of the inflection either. Instead, initially the - s -forms occurred in the SV and VS environments whereas the - st -forms were restricted to the SV environments. This distribution explains why the verbs ending in - stu , which appeared only in the VS environments, could not have triggered the change of - s to -st . As the ending - st spread to the VS environment as well, the ending - s was confined to the VS environments where it survived into the twelfth century.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18756719-12340340
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endings -s and -st in the 2nd Person Singular Present Indicative in Old English

Elena Afros
Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Endings -s and -st in the 2nd Person Singular Present Indicative in Old English

Elena Afros
article en

Abstract

Abstract The replacement of the ending - s with - st in the 2nd person singular present indicative is an often-discussed diachronic development in Old English. Whereas most accounts center on the origins of - st , the present study focuses on the competition between the two endings throughout the Old English period. The current examination of the witnesses dating between the ninth and eleventh centuries shows that the - s - and - st -forms did not contrast on the phonological and morphological features generally cited in the analyses of this change. The adjacency of the pronominal subject did not affect the choice of the inflection either. Instead, initially the - s -forms occurred in the SV and VS environments whereas the - st -forms were restricted to the SV environments. This distribution explains why the verbs ending in - stu , which appeared only in the VS environments, could not have triggered the change of - s to -st . As the ending - st spread to the VS environment as well, the ending - s was confined to the VS environments where it survived into the twelfth century.

Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren GermanistikVol. 84(4)
St. Jerome's University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.