To Move or Not to Move: Factors of Mind–Body Practice Engagement in a Population-Based Study

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Mind-body practices (MBPs), which include seated- (meditation) and movement-based practices (yoga, Tai Chi, <i>qigong</i>), have grown increasingly popular in the United States for improving mental and physical wellness. While literature has identified socioeconomic and health-related factors related to seated- and movement-MBP engagement separately, no studies have explored the factors associated with combined-MBP use. This study accordingly used Anderson's behavioral model of health service utilization to explore sociodemographic and health-related factors associated with seated-, movement-, and combined-MBP engagement among a representative adult sample in the 2017 National Health Interview Survey. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Descriptive statistics were used to summarize sample characteristics. Multinomial logistic regression using survey weights examined associations between predisposing (<i>race-ethnicity</i>, <i>age</i>, <i>geographic region</i>, <i>sex</i>, <i>sexual minority status</i>, and <i>marital status</i>), enabling (<i>educational attainment</i>, <i>income</i>, <i>having continuous health insurance coverage</i>, and <i>having flexible spending accounts</i>), and needs factors (<i>psychological distress</i>, <i>self-reported health</i>, <i>and chronic pain</i>) with type of MBP engagement. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Nearly 6% (5.8%) of the U.S. adult population practiced combined-MBPs. Results also showed that educational attainment was associated with increasingly higher odds of utilizing all forms of MBPs and revealed racial-ethnic disparities in movement- and combined-MBP engagement. Combined-MBP engagement was roughly two times higher among those with moderate psychological distress (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.58-2.32; <i>p</i> < 0.001), severe psychological distress (RRR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.35-2.85; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and chronic pain. <b><i>Conclusions and Implications:</i></b> Findings suggest that combined-MBPs are utilized by a significant portion of the U.S. population and that engagement has varied distribution across sociodemographic and health factors. Considering the association of combined-MBP usage with mental and physical health needs, the authors recommend that health care providers suggest combined-MBPs as an additional resource for patients with psychological distress or mild chronic pain. Future practice and research can focus on increasing accessibility to MBPs in education settings to reduce racial-ethnic disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0288
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Move or Not to Move: Factors of Mind–Body Practice Engagement in a Population-Based Study

Nicole Nicotera, My Ngoc To, Kaipeng Wang
1 citations
Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
0.64
article

To Move or Not to Move: Factors of Mind–Body Practice Engagement in a Population-Based Study

Nicole Nicotera, My Ngoc To, Kaipeng Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Mind-body practices (MBPs), which include seated- (meditation) and movement-based practices (yoga, Tai Chi, <i>qigong</i>), have grown increasingly popular in the United States for improving mental and physical wellness. While literature has identified socioeconomic and health-related factors related to seated- and movement-MBP engagement separately, no studies have explored the factors associated with combined-MBP use. This study accordingly used Anderson's behavioral model of health service utilization to explore sociodemographic and health-related factors associated with seated-, movement-, and combined-MBP engagement among a representative adult sample in the 2017 National Health Interview Survey. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Descriptive statistics were used to summarize sample characteristics. Multinomial logistic regression using survey weights examined associations between predisposing (<i>race-ethnicity</i>, <i>age</i>, <i>geographic region</i>, <i>sex</i>, <i>sexual minority status</i>, and <i>marital status</i>), enabling (<i>educational attainment</i>, <i>income</i>, <i>having continuous health insurance coverage</i>, and <i>having flexible spending accounts</i>), and needs factors (<i>psychological distress</i>, <i>self-reported health</i>, <i>and chronic pain</i>) with type of MBP engagement. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Nearly 6% (5.8%) of the U.S. adult population practiced combined-MBPs. Results also showed that educational attainment was associated with increasingly higher odds of utilizing all forms of MBPs and revealed racial-ethnic disparities in movement- and combined-MBP engagement. Combined-MBP engagement was roughly two times higher among those with moderate psychological distress (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.58-2.32; <i>p</i> < 0.001), severe psychological distress (RRR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.35-2.85; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and chronic pain. <b><i>Conclusions and Implications:</i></b> Findings suggest that combined-MBPs are utilized by a significant portion of the U.S. population and that engagement has varied distribution across sociodemographic and health factors. Considering the association of combined-MBP usage with mental and physical health needs, the authors recommend that health care providers suggest combined-MBPs as an additional resource for patients with psychological distress or mild chronic pain. Future practice and research can focus on increasing accessibility to MBPs in education settings to reduce racial-ethnic disparities.

Journal of Integrative and Complementary MedicineVol. 31(4)
University of Denver (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.