Considering water-temperature synergistic factors improves simulations of stomatal conductance models under plastic film mulching

Accurately simulating stomatal behavior is crucial for understanding water, carbon, and energy fluxes between land and atmosphere. Given the significant impact of plastic film mulching on water and temperature, it is essential to incorporate water and temperature modifications into stomatal conductance models under these conditions. In this study, we evaluated three commonly used stomatal conductance models: Ball-Woodrow-Berry (BWB), Ball-Berry-Leuning (BBL), and unified stomatal optimization (USO), to simulate the stomatal conductance of spring maize with or without mulching. We introduced modifications based on air temperature, canopy temperature, and water-temperature synergistic factors. Our results indicate that the USO model performed best, followed by the BBL and BWB models. Introducing temperature response functions improved simulation accuracy, with water-temperature synergistic models (-Tc&T) outperforming others. Models modified by canopy temperature (-Tc) outperformed those modified by air temperature (-Ta). Specifically, for the BWB model, the -Ta, -Tc, and -Tc&T modifications decreased root mean square error (RMSE) by 11.5–33.3 %, 19.2–50.6 %, and 29.5–56.7 %, respectively. For the BBL model, these reductions were 6.0–30.4 %, 20.9–48.1 %, and 25.4–52.9 %, respectively. For the USO model, the reductions were 7.9–55.2 %, 11.1–56.3 %, and 27.8–64.4 %, respectively. By comparing the simulated stomatal conductance curves with the 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of the observed data, we determined that the water-temperature synergistic model is optimal for various temperature conditions, followed by the Tc-modified and Ta-modified models. This study enhances our understanding of stomatal conductance under different temperature conditions and offers a foundation for accurately simulating carbon and water cycles in agricultural ecosystems under diverse water and temperature conditions. • Integrated temperature-modified factors into stomatal conductance models • Canopy temperature-modified models outperformed air temperature-modified models • Water-temperature synergistic-modified models performed best under plastic film mulching

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109211
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considering water-temperature synergistic factors improves simulations of stomatal conductance models under plastic film mulching

Zhang Ren-You, Yunxin Zhang, Kadambot H. M. Siddique, Cheng Li et al.
3 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
0.85
article

Considering water-temperature synergistic factors improves simulations of stomatal conductance models under plastic film mulching

Zhang Ren-You, Yunxin Zhang, Kadambot H. M. Siddique, Cheng Li, Wenxin Zhang, Jingui Wang, Hao Feng
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Accurately simulating stomatal behavior is crucial for understanding water, carbon, and energy fluxes between land and atmosphere. Given the significant impact of plastic film mulching on water and temperature, it is essential to incorporate water and temperature modifications into stomatal conductance models under these conditions. In this study, we evaluated three commonly used stomatal conductance models: Ball-Woodrow-Berry (BWB), Ball-Berry-Leuning (BBL), and unified stomatal optimization (USO), to simulate the stomatal conductance of spring maize with or without mulching. We introduced modifications based on air temperature, canopy temperature, and water-temperature synergistic factors. Our results indicate that the USO model performed best, followed by the BBL and BWB models. Introducing temperature response functions improved simulation accuracy, with water-temperature synergistic models (-Tc&T) outperforming others. Models modified by canopy temperature (-Tc) outperformed those modified by air temperature (-Ta). Specifically, for the BWB model, the -Ta, -Tc, and -Tc&T modifications decreased root mean square error (RMSE) by 11.5–33.3 %, 19.2–50.6 %, and 29.5–56.7 %, respectively. For the BBL model, these reductions were 6.0–30.4 %, 20.9–48.1 %, and 25.4–52.9 %, respectively. For the USO model, the reductions were 7.9–55.2 %, 11.1–56.3 %, and 27.8–64.4 %, respectively. By comparing the simulated stomatal conductance curves with the 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of the observed data, we determined that the water-temperature synergistic model is optimal for various temperature conditions, followed by the Tc-modified and Ta-modified models. This study enhances our understanding of stomatal conductance under different temperature conditions and offers a foundation for accurately simulating carbon and water cycles in agricultural ecosystems under diverse water and temperature conditions. • Integrated temperature-modified factors into stomatal conductance models • Canopy temperature-modified models outperformed air temperature-modified models • Water-temperature synergistic-modified models performed best under plastic film mulching

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 306
Hebei University of Engineering (CN), Stockholm University (SE), The University of Western Australia (AU), Northwest A&F University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Lunds Universitet, China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.