Between real change and institutional facade: unpacking operational sustainability in English universities

Purpose This study aims to critically examine operational sustainability (OS) in English public universities, uniquely integrating neo-institutional and organisational legitimacy theories to explore the alignment of sustainability strategies with organisational practices. Design/methodology/approach Adopting a rigorous qualitative approach, this study combines semi-structured interviews with 20 OS managers and a thorough document analysis involving over 800 documents. This robust methodology ensures a deep exploration of institutional sustainability dynamics. Findings This study reveals a significant discrepancy between stated and actual sustainability performances, with institutions frequently engaging in symbolic sustainability efforts. It highlights the need for robust benchmarking systems to accurately measure and encourage genuine sustainability integration. Practical implications The identified barriers and the subsequent recommended approaches can guide public universities in their strategic planning and implementation of OS initiatives, ensuring more effective outcomes. Social implications This study underscores the importance of university stakeholders in shaping OS engagement. It signals a need for broader societal awareness and collaboration to truly drive universities towards a more sustainable future. Originality/value This study is original in its dual-theoretical approach, applying both neo-institutional and organisational legitimacy theories to dissect the complexities of sustainability in higher education. It extends the discourse on sustainability by scrutinising the often-overlooked gap between policy and practice, providing a nuanced understanding of institutional behaviours and pressures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-11-2023-0559
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between real change and institutional facade: unpacking operational sustainability in English universities

Alex John Hope, Hongyi Zhang
2 citations
International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
Sustainability in Higher Education
4.19
article

Between real change and institutional facade: unpacking operational sustainability in English universities

Alex John Hope, Hongyi Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to critically examine operational sustainability (OS) in English public universities, uniquely integrating neo-institutional and organisational legitimacy theories to explore the alignment of sustainability strategies with organisational practices. Design/methodology/approach Adopting a rigorous qualitative approach, this study combines semi-structured interviews with 20 OS managers and a thorough document analysis involving over 800 documents. This robust methodology ensures a deep exploration of institutional sustainability dynamics. Findings This study reveals a significant discrepancy between stated and actual sustainability performances, with institutions frequently engaging in symbolic sustainability efforts. It highlights the need for robust benchmarking systems to accurately measure and encourage genuine sustainability integration. Practical implications The identified barriers and the subsequent recommended approaches can guide public universities in their strategic planning and implementation of OS initiatives, ensuring more effective outcomes. Social implications This study underscores the importance of university stakeholders in shaping OS engagement. It signals a need for broader societal awareness and collaboration to truly drive universities towards a more sustainable future. Originality/value This study is original in its dual-theoretical approach, applying both neo-institutional and organisational legitimacy theories to dissect the complexities of sustainability in higher education. It extends the discourse on sustainability by scrutinising the often-overlooked gap between policy and practice, providing a nuanced understanding of institutional behaviours and pressures.

International Journal of Sustainability in Higher EducationVol. 27(1)
Northumbria University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sustainability in Higher Education
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.