The Multi-Stage Mixed Methods Framework: A new research design to combine hypothesis development and hypothesis testing and to embed machine learning and practitioner engagement in the social sciences
Multi-methods research designs typically focus either on developing or on testing pre-existing hypotheses. We outline a new methodological framework to combine hypothesis development and testing into a coherent and robust multi-method research design: the Multi-Stage Mixed-Methods Framework (MSMMF). The MSMMF is a novel approach to carefully sequence and combine different methods, such as machine learning (ML), practitioner engagement, inferential statistical analysis, qualitative comparative analysis, process-tracing and/or congruence analysis. We demonstrate that the MSMMF provides a holistic research design for developing and testing hypotheses, combining the strengths of existing mixed-methods approaches and embedding ML and the involvement of practitioners throughout the research process. We present the MSMMF’s application to a theoretically challenging, empirically rich and policy-relevant question: Why do some peace processes bring an end to large-scale conflict-related violence while others do not?
Authors
- Natascha S. Neudorfer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9956-3529)
- Giuditta Fontana (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8874-9213)
- Argyro Kartsonaki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5186-6996)
- Stefan Wolff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9931-5309)
Institutions
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy (DE)
- Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Political Science Review
- Published
- 2024-12-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121241293109
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.26
Funders
- United States Institute of Peace
- Economic and Social Research Council