Litigation as a Governance Strategy: Courts, Bureaucracies and the Welfare Rights of Irregular Migrants

ABSTRACT Over the last few years, the welfare rights of illegalized migrants living in Belgium have become increasingly restricted. Without a legal residence status, such rights are limited to (conditional) access to public healthcare. Welfare courts have, however, sometimes gone against the grain and granted social assistance benefits to irregularized applicants, based on fundamental rights principles. Conflicting jurisprudential trends have emerged and are still debating the ambiguous, and multiple meanings of ‘human dignity’ especially for those with a precarious immigration status. This article delves into the role of courts in the implementation of migrants' welfare rights. Based on ethnographic fieldwork within welfare courts, in public administrations and amongst migrants, it shows how litigation has become part of the daily governance of social protection. This allows certain categories of migrants to gain access to financial assistance, yet creates lengthy, complex procedures and leading to great uncertainty for claimants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Administration
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13107
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Migration, Identity, and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Litigation as a Governance Strategy: Courts, Bureaucracies and the Welfare Rights of Irregular Migrants

Sophie Andreetta
2 citations
Social Policy and Administration
Migration, Identity, and Health
2.26
article

Litigation as a Governance Strategy: Courts, Bureaucracies and the Welfare Rights of Irregular Migrants

Sophie Andreetta
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the last few years, the welfare rights of illegalized migrants living in Belgium have become increasingly restricted. Without a legal residence status, such rights are limited to (conditional) access to public healthcare. Welfare courts have, however, sometimes gone against the grain and granted social assistance benefits to irregularized applicants, based on fundamental rights principles. Conflicting jurisprudential trends have emerged and are still debating the ambiguous, and multiple meanings of ‘human dignity’ especially for those with a precarious immigration status. This article delves into the role of courts in the implementation of migrants' welfare rights. Based on ethnographic fieldwork within welfare courts, in public administrations and amongst migrants, it shows how litigation has become part of the daily governance of social protection. This allows certain categories of migrants to gain access to financial assistance, yet creates lengthy, complex procedures and leading to great uncertainty for claimants.

Social Policy and AdministrationVol. 59(4)
University of Liège (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Migration, Identity, and Health
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Litigation as a Governance Strategy: Courts, Bureaucracies and the Welfare Rights of Irregular Migrants — Sophie Andreetta · Social Policy and Administration (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS