Quality of Information Provided by Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Surrounding the Reconstructive Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between <scp>ChatGPT4</scp> and Claude2

Our findings indicate that neither chatbot exhibits a decisive superiority in all aspects. Nonetheless, ChatGPT4 demonstrates greater accuracy and comprehensiveness for specific types of questions and the simpler language used may aid patient inquiries. However, many evaluators disagree with chatbot information, highlighting that AI systems cannot serve as a substitute for advice from medical professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Otolaryngology
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14261
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Information Provided by Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Surrounding the Reconstructive Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between ChatGPT4 and Claude2

Nicoletta Gardenal, Andrea Pettorelli, Giancarlo Tirelli, Alberto Vito Marcuzzo et al.
6 citations
Clinical Otolaryngology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.72
article

Quality of Information Provided by Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Surrounding the Reconstructive Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between ChatGPT4 and Claude2

Nicoletta Gardenal, Andrea Pettorelli, Giancarlo Tirelli, Alberto Vito Marcuzzo, Giancarlo Ottaviano, Alfonso Fortunati, Fabiola Giudici, Marco Ferrari, Simone Zucchini, Roberto Baruca, Marco Stellin, Luigi Angelo Vaira, Chiara Lazzarin, Franco Trabalzini, Daniele Borsetto, Paolo Boscolo‐Rizzo, Egidio Sia, Giacomo Spinato, Jerry Polesel
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Our findings indicate that neither chatbot exhibits a decisive superiority in all aspects. Nonetheless, ChatGPT4 demonstrates greater accuracy and comprehensiveness for specific types of questions and the simpler language used may aid patient inquiries. However, many evaluators disagree with chatbot information, highlighting that AI systems cannot serve as a substitute for advice from medical professionals.

Clinical OtolaryngologyVol. 50(2)
University of Padua (IT), University of Trieste (IT), University of Sassari (IT), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana (IT), Meyer Children's Hospital (IT), Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB), University of Florence (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quality of Information Provided by Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Surrounding the Reconstructive Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between <scp>ChatGPT4</scp> and Claude2 — Nicoletta Gardenal, Andrea Pettorelli, et al. · Clinical Otolaryngology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS