Large Language Model for Assignment Feedback on Open-ended Subjective Questions

Feedback is a key factor in motivating and consolidating learning, but in classroom teaching, a teacher needs to provide timely and effective feedback on the homework of dozens of students, which puts much pressure on the teacher. Meanwhile, existing automatic feedback systems are not suitable for open writing tasks. The emergence of ChatGPT has attracted the attention of researchers. We selected 28 open-ended subjective question assignments to input into ChatGPT, and compared and analyzed the scores and comments generated by ChatGPT with those of teachers, to explore the feasibility of using a Large Language Model to provide timely feedback for open-ended subjective questions. Our research indicates that ChatGPT can score and evaluate learners' open-ended subjective homework, and the rating of ChatGPT can be similar to that of teachers. Moreover, ChatGPT's comments can be similar in terms of focus and emotional bias to those of teachers, indicating that ChatGPT's ratings and comments have high credibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Educational Research
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30560/ier.v7n3p1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large Language Model for Assignment Feedback on Open-ended Subjective Questions

Xiaogang Li, Zhiqing Liu
1 citations
International Educational Research
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
article

Large Language Model for Assignment Feedback on Open-ended Subjective Questions

Xiaogang Li, Zhiqing Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Feedback is a key factor in motivating and consolidating learning, but in classroom teaching, a teacher needs to provide timely and effective feedback on the homework of dozens of students, which puts much pressure on the teacher. Meanwhile, existing automatic feedback systems are not suitable for open writing tasks. The emergence of ChatGPT has attracted the attention of researchers. We selected 28 open-ended subjective question assignments to input into ChatGPT, and compared and analyzed the scores and comments generated by ChatGPT with those of teachers, to explore the feasibility of using a Large Language Model to provide timely feedback for open-ended subjective questions. Our research indicates that ChatGPT can score and evaluate learners' open-ended subjective homework, and the rating of ChatGPT can be similar to that of teachers. Moreover, ChatGPT's comments can be similar in terms of focus and emotional bias to those of teachers, indicating that ChatGPT's ratings and comments have high credibility.

International Educational ResearchVol. 7(3)
Yunnan Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Large Language Model for Assignment Feedback on Open-ended Subjective Questions — Xiaogang Li, Zhiqing Liu · International Educational Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS