“Behind the Veil”: Unmasking Anti-blackness in Presidential Discourse and Responses to Racialized Incidents

Discourses by university presidents in the wake of racialized incidents continues to be a pressing issue for higher education. Presidential rhetoric can harm those who experience racialized incidents, such as Black students. Using critical discourse analysis, we examined the variations of discourse that a president uses to respond to racialized incidents. Explicitly, as issues of anti-blackness continue to be prevalent within colleges and universities, we sought to highlight how the president’s discourse reinforces anti-blackness narratives perpetuating systemic racism. We center Critical Race Theory and BlackCrit to name how university presidents wrestle with acknowledging anti-blackness. Through a Black liberatory fantasy stance, we offer a framework to engage in radical hope that reimagines what presidential rhetoric should look like, including how university presidents, administrators, and other campus leaders should respond to racialized incidents in meaningful ways that support Black communities and establish equitable policies and practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.a946603
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Behind the Veil”: Unmasking Anti-blackness in Presidential Discourse and Responses to Racialized Incidents

Melvin A. Whitehead, Kaleb L. Briscoe, Veronica A. Jones
5 citations
Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education
Critical Race Theory in Education
5.66
article

“Behind the Veil”: Unmasking Anti-blackness in Presidential Discourse and Responses to Racialized Incidents

Melvin A. Whitehead, Kaleb L. Briscoe, Veronica A. Jones
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Discourses by university presidents in the wake of racialized incidents continues to be a pressing issue for higher education. Presidential rhetoric can harm those who experience racialized incidents, such as Black students. Using critical discourse analysis, we examined the variations of discourse that a president uses to respond to racialized incidents. Explicitly, as issues of anti-blackness continue to be prevalent within colleges and universities, we sought to highlight how the president’s discourse reinforces anti-blackness narratives perpetuating systemic racism. We center Critical Race Theory and BlackCrit to name how university presidents wrestle with acknowledging anti-blackness. Through a Black liberatory fantasy stance, we offer a framework to engage in radical hope that reimagines what presidential rhetoric should look like, including how university presidents, administrators, and other campus leaders should respond to racialized incidents in meaningful ways that support Black communities and establish equitable policies and practices.

Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Critical Race Theory in Education
5.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.