Adults’ beliefs about eating the USDA vegetable subgroups: A Reasoned Action Approach Elicitation

A healthy diet includes quantity (e.g. cups per day) and a variety of vegetables. The Dietary Guidelines recommends consuming vegetables from five subgroups (dark green, red/orange, beans/peas/lentils, starchy, and other vegetables). Despite being introduced almost 20 years ago most Americans are not eating within all of the subgroups, therefore thepurpose of this study was to assess if there are differences in beliefs pertaining to eating within the vegetable subgroups,using the Reasoned Action Approach. A nationwide convenience sample of adults (19-59 years old) were recruited via Forthright Access. Volunteers were sent an online survey and randomized to one of six groups: one of the five vegetable subgroups, or an overall vegetable group. Participants (n=180; 30 per group) were informed of the recommendation for their group and given several examples (Appendix 1). Four types of beliefs were elicited using open-ended questions (behavioral, injunctive normative, descriptive normative and control beliefs). Next, belief types were blinded by group and coded into distinct categories by two independent coders. No demographic variables differed between groups. There were no significant differences in the average number of behavioral, injunctive normative, descriptive normative or control beliefs between groups (all p’s>0.05). There were also no significant differences in the distribution of the belief types (all p’s>0.05). Taste and enjoyment, health benefits, and cost were common factors reported for consuming all vegetable subgroups. Adults appeared to be generally unaware of the differences in nutrient profiles and health benefits of different vegetable subgroups, therefore public health interventions should be developed to overcome this lack of awareness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Health Behavior Research
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4148/2572-1836.1238
Primary Topic
Culinary Culture and Tourism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adults’ beliefs about eating the USDA vegetable subgroups: A Reasoned Action Approach Elicitation

Paul Branscum, Kaylee Weakley
Health Behavior Research
Culinary Culture and Tourism
article

Adults’ beliefs about eating the USDA vegetable subgroups: A Reasoned Action Approach Elicitation

Paul Branscum, Kaylee Weakley
article en

Abstract

A healthy diet includes quantity (e.g. cups per day) and a variety of vegetables. The Dietary Guidelines recommends consuming vegetables from five subgroups (dark green, red/orange, beans/peas/lentils, starchy, and other vegetables). Despite being introduced almost 20 years ago most Americans are not eating within all of the subgroups, therefore thepurpose of this study was to assess if there are differences in beliefs pertaining to eating within the vegetable subgroups,using the Reasoned Action Approach. A nationwide convenience sample of adults (19-59 years old) were recruited via Forthright Access. Volunteers were sent an online survey and randomized to one of six groups: one of the five vegetable subgroups, or an overall vegetable group. Participants (n=180; 30 per group) were informed of the recommendation for their group and given several examples (Appendix 1). Four types of beliefs were elicited using open-ended questions (behavioral, injunctive normative, descriptive normative and control beliefs). Next, belief types were blinded by group and coded into distinct categories by two independent coders. No demographic variables differed between groups. There were no significant differences in the average number of behavioral, injunctive normative, descriptive normative or control beliefs between groups (all p’s>0.05). There were also no significant differences in the distribution of the belief types (all p’s>0.05). Taste and enjoyment, health benefits, and cost were common factors reported for consuming all vegetable subgroups. Adults appeared to be generally unaware of the differences in nutrient profiles and health benefits of different vegetable subgroups, therefore public health interventions should be developed to overcome this lack of awareness.

Health Behavior ResearchVol. 7(4)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Culinary Culture and Tourism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adults’ beliefs about eating the USDA vegetable subgroups: A Reasoned Action Approach Elicitation — Paul Branscum, Kaylee Weakley · Health Behavior Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS