Multilingual Prompting in LLMs: Investigating the Accuracy and Performance

Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5 are trained using data from multiple sources, such as web data, which are predominantly in English. Hence, LLMs are commonly hypothesized to exhibit significant variations in response accuracy across multiple languages. This research investigates the hypothesis that the primary language of training data impacts the accuracy of responses to multilingual prompts. The experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of LLMs across English and several other supported and unsupported languages, with questions structured to measure accuracy quantitatively. The study has been conducted on diverse tasks that include mathematical operations, word manipulation, and linguistic analysis. The results of the experiment demonstrate a clear edge of English prompts over prompts in other languages, with an accuracy of 80% to 100% for English prompts. A significant degradation is observed in accuracy for the same prompts translated into multiple languages other than English. The research underscores the limitations of English-dominated LLM architectures in effectively handling prompts across diverse languages. The study reveals the requirement for support for multiple languages to enable equitable access to AI-powered applications throughout the world. The source code is available at github.com/Pro-GenAI/PromptLang. Keywords: Large Language Models (LLMs), multilingual prompts, cross-language NLP, response accuracy, Natural Language Processing (NLP)

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem17694
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multilingual Prompting in LLMs: Investigating the Accuracy and Performance

Praneeth Vadlapati
2 citations
INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
Topic Modeling
0.69
article

Multilingual Prompting in LLMs: Investigating the Accuracy and Performance

Praneeth Vadlapati
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5 are trained using data from multiple sources, such as web data, which are predominantly in English. Hence, LLMs are commonly hypothesized to exhibit significant variations in response accuracy across multiple languages. This research investigates the hypothesis that the primary language of training data impacts the accuracy of responses to multilingual prompts. The experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of LLMs across English and several other supported and unsupported languages, with questions structured to measure accuracy quantitatively. The study has been conducted on diverse tasks that include mathematical operations, word manipulation, and linguistic analysis. The results of the experiment demonstrate a clear edge of English prompts over prompts in other languages, with an accuracy of 80% to 100% for English prompts. A significant degradation is observed in accuracy for the same prompts translated into multiple languages other than English. The research underscores the limitations of English-dominated LLM architectures in effectively handling prompts across diverse languages. The study reveals the requirement for support for multiple languages to enable equitable access to AI-powered applications throughout the world. The source code is available at github.com/Pro-GenAI/PromptLang. Keywords: Large Language Models (LLMs), multilingual prompts, cross-language NLP, response accuracy, Natural Language Processing (NLP)

INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENTVol. 08(12)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Topic Modeling
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.