Automated derivation of diagnostic criteria for lung cancer using natural language processing on electronic health records: a pilot study
The proposed methods demonstrated success in leveraging unstructured secondary-care data to derive diagnostic criteria for lung cancer, outperforming existing risk tools. These advancements show potential for enhancing patient care and results. However, it is essential to tackle specific limitations by integrating primary care data to ensure a more thorough and unbiased development of diagnostic criteria. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of contextualising SNOMED-CT concepts into meaningful terminology that resonates with clinicians, facilitating a clearer and more tangible understanding of the criteria applied.
Authors
- William Ricketts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0475-0744)
- Chris Tackaberry
- John Conibear (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-7074)
- Sophie Williams (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2198-7938)
- Andrew Houston (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9973-3818)
- Charles Gutteridge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2749-7008)
Institutions
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Published
- 2024-12-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02790-y
- Primary Topic
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- AstraZeneca