Putting earthworm conservation on the map: Shortfalls and solutions for developing earthworm conservation

Earthworms are keystone organisms that influence both soil function and community assembly of other soil organisms. However, soils are increasingly threatened by global change, so there is an urgent need to consider earthworms in conservation strategies. Earthworm monitoring has been promoted in numerous European and country research programs, and the global interest in earthworm conservation is rising, resulting in a rapid increase in the availability of earthworm data. However, most research focuses on a limited number of local-scale indicators, mainly based on abundance, biomass, and species richness of assemblages along with Bouché's ecological categories. We argue that these metrics are insufficient to effectively address earthworm conservation issues. We suggest four ecological characteristics which may be more informative for the development of conservation plans. Measurement of how much a species is (i) rare or common, (ii) native/nonnative, endemic and invasive, (iii) a specialist or generalist, and (iv) a winner or loser in the Anthropocene are all promising tools to support earthworm diversity conservation. These metrics could also be applied to functional traits, but better definition of these traits is fundamental. Finally, we emphasize the need to broaden spatial scales in earthworm studies by analyzing alpha, beta and gamma components of diversity, as local diversity alone can be misleading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110911
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Putting earthworm conservation on the map: Shortfalls and solutions for developing earthworm conservation

Kevin R. Butt, Luca Santini, Renée‐Claire Le Bayon, Bart Muys et al.
9 citations
Biological Conservation
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
9.26
article

Putting earthworm conservation on the map: Shortfalls and solutions for developing earthworm conservation

Kevin R. Butt, Luca Santini, Renée‐Claire Le Bayon, Bart Muys, Céline Pelosi, Yvan Capowiez, Sylvain Gérard, Claire Marsden, Helen R. P. Phillips, María J.I. Briones, Thibaud Decaëns, Wilfried Thuiller, Kevin Hoeffner, Mickaël Hedde, Daniel F. Marchán, Guenola Pérès, Daniel Cluzeau
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Earthworms are keystone organisms that influence both soil function and community assembly of other soil organisms. However, soils are increasingly threatened by global change, so there is an urgent need to consider earthworms in conservation strategies. Earthworm monitoring has been promoted in numerous European and country research programs, and the global interest in earthworm conservation is rising, resulting in a rapid increase in the availability of earthworm data. However, most research focuses on a limited number of local-scale indicators, mainly based on abundance, biomass, and species richness of assemblages along with Bouché's ecological categories. We argue that these metrics are insufficient to effectively address earthworm conservation issues. We suggest four ecological characteristics which may be more informative for the development of conservation plans. Measurement of how much a species is (i) rare or common, (ii) native/nonnative, endemic and invasive, (iii) a specialist or generalist, and (iv) a winner or loser in the Anthropocene are all promising tools to support earthworm diversity conservation. These metrics could also be applied to functional traits, but better definition of these traits is fundamental. Finally, we emphasize the need to broaden spatial scales in earthworm studies by analyzing alpha, beta and gamma components of diversity, as local diversity alone can be misleading.

Biological ConservationVol. 302
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Helsinki (FI), University of Lancashire (GB), Institut Agro Rennes-Angers (FR), Ecosystèmes, Biodiversité, Evolution (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), Ecologie fonctionnelle & biogéochimie des sols & des agro-systèmes (FR), Sol Agro et hydrosystème Spatialisation (FR), Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (FR), EMMAH - Environnement Méditerranéen et Modélisation des Agro-Hydrosystèmes, Université de Rennes (FR), University of Neuchâtel (CH), Universidade de Vigo (ES), KU Leuven (BE)
Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversite, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
9.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.