ENHANCING WELDING QUALITY THROUGH PREDICTIVE MODELLING — INSIGHTS FROM MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES

In this work, the application of various machine learning (ML) algorithms for predicting tensile strength based on welding parameters in AA2014-T6 aluminium alloy joints is studied. Six ML models namely linear regression, AdaBoost regression, random forest regression, support vector regression (SVR), multi-layer perceptron regression and gaussian process regression (GPR) are considered. The comprehensive analysis revealed that SVR exhibited superior generalization capabilities on unseen data, achieving an R² of 0.89 and a low RMSE of 15.64. In contrast, GPR, despite its high training accuracy, showed significant overfitting. This work highlights the potential of ML in optimizing welding parameters and highlights the importance of model selection and tuning to prevent overfitting and ensure reliable predictions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
MM Science Journal
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17973/mmsj.2024_12_2024124
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ENHANCING WELDING QUALITY THROUGH PREDICTIVE MODELLING — INSIGHTS FROM MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES

Ranjan Kumar Ghadai, Pradeep Jangir, Kanak Kalita, Róbert Čep
4 citations
MM Science Journal
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
0.85
article

ENHANCING WELDING QUALITY THROUGH PREDICTIVE MODELLING — INSIGHTS FROM MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES

Ranjan Kumar Ghadai, Pradeep Jangir, Kanak Kalita, Róbert Čep
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In this work, the application of various machine learning (ML) algorithms for predicting tensile strength based on welding parameters in AA2014-T6 aluminium alloy joints is studied. Six ML models namely linear regression, AdaBoost regression, random forest regression, support vector regression (SVR), multi-layer perceptron regression and gaussian process regression (GPR) are considered. The comprehensive analysis revealed that SVR exhibited superior generalization capabilities on unseen data, achieving an R² of 0.89 and a low RMSE of 15.64. In contrast, GPR, despite its high training accuracy, showed significant overfitting. This work highlights the potential of ML in optimizing welding parameters and highlights the importance of model selection and tuning to prevent overfitting and ensure reliable predictions.

MM Science JournalVol. 2024(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ENHANCING WELDING QUALITY THROUGH PREDICTIVE MODELLING — INSIGHTS FROM MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES — Ranjan Kumar Ghadai, Pradeep Jangir, et al. · MM Science Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS