Comparing total suspended solids sensors for improved dewatering of wastewater from non-sewered sanitation

Almost half of the global population relies on non-sewered sanitation, wherein wastewater is treated directly at source or stored onsite and transported by road to treatment facilities (i.e., fecal sludge management). For the protection of public health and environmental ecosystems, efficient non-sewered sanitation systems are needed, in particular in urban areas where infrastructure lags behind rapid urbanization. Wastewater delivered to treatment plants in non-sewered areas has highly variable characteristics, as it arrives in batches from variable infrastructure. Established systems to handle this variability are often land- or energy-intensive, while operation of low-footprint alternatives strongly depends on the wastewater characteristics, making them difficult to implement for highly variable wastewater. The use of sensors could improve process control and increase the robustness of treatment technologies, while reducing the required footprint. However, there are no studies comparing the effectiveness of different sensor methods to measure solids in non-sewered wastewater. We therefore chose six sensors for predicting solids in wastewater and evaluated their performance in variable wastewater with a range of solids content, inorganic particles, salts, and fats. This work demonstrated that the sensors were affected differently by the variable wastewater. Micro-wave and Coriolis-flow technologies were strongly impacted by the addition of fat, oil, and grease as well as salts and inorganics, whereas optical sensors were mostly affected by inorganics, with optical light-attenuation having the lowest overall error, making it the best option for variable wastewater. A low-cost optical light-attenuation sensor had similar accuracy as a more expensive one when the solids content was low, indicating its value for inexpensive monitoring of effluent solids in decentralized settings. Additionally, three sensors were applied for process control of chemically enhanced dewatering with conditioners and geotextiles. Controlling conditioner dosing with sensors in the flocculation tank improved performance with 77% solids reduction, which is in the range of the alternative, time-intensive jar-test method (83% reduction). This study reveals that sensors can be useful in non-sewered wastewater management when the type of input wastewater is accounted for and that even low-cost sensors (<100 USD) can be suitable for many applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123554
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing total suspended solids sensors for improved dewatering of wastewater from non-sewered sanitation

Rita al Jahjah, Linda Strande, Maxwell Bergström, Michael Vogel et al.
1 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
0.20
article

Comparing total suspended solids sensors for improved dewatering of wastewater from non-sewered sanitation

Rita al Jahjah, Linda Strande, Maxwell Bergström, Michael Vogel, Charbel Hankache, Rabea Touma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Almost half of the global population relies on non-sewered sanitation, wherein wastewater is treated directly at source or stored onsite and transported by road to treatment facilities (i.e., fecal sludge management). For the protection of public health and environmental ecosystems, efficient non-sewered sanitation systems are needed, in particular in urban areas where infrastructure lags behind rapid urbanization. Wastewater delivered to treatment plants in non-sewered areas has highly variable characteristics, as it arrives in batches from variable infrastructure. Established systems to handle this variability are often land- or energy-intensive, while operation of low-footprint alternatives strongly depends on the wastewater characteristics, making them difficult to implement for highly variable wastewater. The use of sensors could improve process control and increase the robustness of treatment technologies, while reducing the required footprint. However, there are no studies comparing the effectiveness of different sensor methods to measure solids in non-sewered wastewater. We therefore chose six sensors for predicting solids in wastewater and evaluated their performance in variable wastewater with a range of solids content, inorganic particles, salts, and fats. This work demonstrated that the sensors were affected differently by the variable wastewater. Micro-wave and Coriolis-flow technologies were strongly impacted by the addition of fat, oil, and grease as well as salts and inorganics, whereas optical sensors were mostly affected by inorganics, with optical light-attenuation having the lowest overall error, making it the best option for variable wastewater. A low-cost optical light-attenuation sensor had similar accuracy as a more expensive one when the solids content was low, indicating its value for inexpensive monitoring of effluent solids in decentralized settings. Additionally, three sensors were applied for process control of chemically enhanced dewatering with conditioners and geotextiles. Controlling conditioner dosing with sensors in the flocculation tank improved performance with 77% solids reduction, which is in the range of the alternative, time-intensive jar-test method (83% reduction). This study reveals that sensors can be useful in non-sewered wastewater management when the type of input wastewater is accounted for and that even low-cost sensors (<100 USD) can be suitable for many applications.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 373
Lebanese Association for Energy Saving & for Environment (LB), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.