Mapping hazards to the global food system

Environmental hazards associated with the global food system threaten societal integrity. Yet, there is a major data gap in the global understanding of how the prevalence of hazards is changing over time, how different classes of hazard are distributed, and whether the combined literature represents hazard prevalence equitably across research, policy and legislation, and news. Here, we explore this data gap, leveraging global research, policy, and news databases. We reveal increasing attention on food system hazards over time, in line with major geopolitical events. Coverage on environmental hazards is not distributed equally geographically, and media attention does not match research and policy evidence focus. Climate change and water scarcity in particular receive substantial attention across all source types, whilst, for example biodiversity loss, genetic erosion, or harmful algal blooms receive much less. Environmental, financial and food systems sustainability damage due to hazard neglect should be avoided and a first step is to understand, map, and quantify biases in focus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-13475-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping hazards to the global food system

Julie Bremner, Silviu O. Petrovan, Samuel W. Short, Raja K. Iyer et al.
2 citations
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
0.92
article

Mapping hazards to the global food system

Julie Bremner, Silviu O. Petrovan, Samuel W. Short, Raja K. Iyer, David C. Aldridge, David F. Willer, William J. Sutherland, Diana Khripko
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Environmental hazards associated with the global food system threaten societal integrity. Yet, there is a major data gap in the global understanding of how the prevalence of hazards is changing over time, how different classes of hazard are distributed, and whether the combined literature represents hazard prevalence equitably across research, policy and legislation, and news. Here, we explore this data gap, leveraging global research, policy, and news databases. We reveal increasing attention on food system hazards over time, in line with major geopolitical events. Coverage on environmental hazards is not distributed equally geographically, and media attention does not match research and policy evidence focus. Climate change and water scarcity in particular receive substantial attention across all source types, whilst, for example biodiversity loss, genetic erosion, or harmful algal blooms receive much less. Environmental, financial and food systems sustainability damage due to hazard neglect should be avoided and a first step is to understand, map, and quantify biases in focus.

Environmental Monitoring and AssessmentVol. 197(1)
University of East Anglia (GB), Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Norwich Research Park (GB), Maastricht University (NL), Conservation Leadership Programme (GB)
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government, Animal and Plant Health Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.