Debate Based on Inquiry Learning (DBOIL): An Innovative Learning Model to Improve Students’ Skills in Scientific Argumentation

In the 21st century, education places significant emphasis on developing scientific argumentation as a crucial skill. Teaching these skills requires an instructional design that allows students to construct and critique arguments actively, support claims with evidence and reasoning, and then reject opposing claims and evidence. Debate based on inquiry learning (DBOIL) is an innovative learning model that was developed and is believed to be able to facilitate these things. This research seeks to assess the influence of implementing DBOIL on enhancing students' skills in scientific argumentation. This research employed a one-group pretest-posttest design, with normalized change analysis and paired t-test. Research findings indicate that the implementation of DBOIL has demonstrably improved scientific argumentation skills, with a notable 76.67% of students exhibiting improvement in the high category. Other findings show that each phase of DBOIL significantly contributes to increasing the achievement of indicators of scientific argumentation. To maintain the reliability of DBOIL in enhancing students' skills in scientific argumentation, conducting future research on a broader scale is imperative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TEM Journal
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18421/tem134-64
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Debate Based on Inquiry Learning (DBOIL): An Innovative Learning Model to Improve Students’ Skills in Scientific Argumentation

Madlazim Madlazim, Sri Astutik, Ahmad Fauzi Hendratmoko, Wahono Wıdodo
1 citations
TEM Journal
Education and Critical Thinking Development
2.10
article

Debate Based on Inquiry Learning (DBOIL): An Innovative Learning Model to Improve Students’ Skills in Scientific Argumentation

Madlazim Madlazim, Sri Astutik, Ahmad Fauzi Hendratmoko, Wahono Wıdodo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the 21st century, education places significant emphasis on developing scientific argumentation as a crucial skill. Teaching these skills requires an instructional design that allows students to construct and critique arguments actively, support claims with evidence and reasoning, and then reject opposing claims and evidence. Debate based on inquiry learning (DBOIL) is an innovative learning model that was developed and is believed to be able to facilitate these things. This research seeks to assess the influence of implementing DBOIL on enhancing students' skills in scientific argumentation. This research employed a one-group pretest-posttest design, with normalized change analysis and paired t-test. Research findings indicate that the implementation of DBOIL has demonstrably improved scientific argumentation skills, with a notable 76.67% of students exhibiting improvement in the high category. Other findings show that each phase of DBOIL significantly contributes to increasing the achievement of indicators of scientific argumentation. To maintain the reliability of DBOIL in enhancing students' skills in scientific argumentation, conducting future research on a broader scale is imperative.

TEM Journal
State University of Semarang (ID), Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID), Universitas Jember (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.