Soil Moisture–Latent Heat Flux Coupling in Climate Modeling: Insights and Implications from the Offline Land Model

Abstract Understanding the relationship between soil moisture (SM) and latent heat flux (LE) is crucial for forecasting seasonal extremes like heat waves and droughts and grasping long-term climate systems. Despite its importance, substantial disparities exist among various models’ interpretations of this relationship. This study defines four SM–LE indicators: wilting point, critical SM, saturated LE, and SM–LE slope, characterizing SM–LE regimes and corresponding breakpoints delineating the regimes using segmented regression, and scrutinizes model disparities by contrasting conventional coupled simulations with matching offline land model (LM) simulations within phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) framework. It is revealed that those indicators have lower variability among ensemble members from the same model than among different models. Moreover, all indicators except for the SM–LE slope demonstrate strong correlations between the coupled and uncoupled simulations using the same LMs. While the spatial distributions of breakpoint values correspond only moderately well with the indicators’ values, they improve after adjusting for model atmospheric biases of precipitation and downward radiation. The impact of the atmospheric fields on the four SM–LE indicators is well correlated between the coupled and offline experiments, except for the relationship between precipitation and the wilting point. Consequently, this indicates a significant constraint of the SM–LE relationship in coupled model simulations determined by the LM’s behavior. Thus, one may determine much about the land–atmosphere coupling behavior parsimoniously in a model system without running the fully coupled model, justifying a hierarchical approach for model development and assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrometeorology
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-23-0200.1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil Moisture–Latent Heat Flux Coupling in Climate Modeling: Insights and Implications from the Offline Land Model

Paul A. Dirmeyer, Hsin Hsu, Daisuke Tokuda
3 citations
Journal of Hydrometeorology
Climate variability and models
0.85
article

Soil Moisture–Latent Heat Flux Coupling in Climate Modeling: Insights and Implications from the Offline Land Model

Paul A. Dirmeyer, Hsin Hsu, Daisuke Tokuda
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the relationship between soil moisture (SM) and latent heat flux (LE) is crucial for forecasting seasonal extremes like heat waves and droughts and grasping long-term climate systems. Despite its importance, substantial disparities exist among various models’ interpretations of this relationship. This study defines four SM–LE indicators: wilting point, critical SM, saturated LE, and SM–LE slope, characterizing SM–LE regimes and corresponding breakpoints delineating the regimes using segmented regression, and scrutinizes model disparities by contrasting conventional coupled simulations with matching offline land model (LM) simulations within phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) framework. It is revealed that those indicators have lower variability among ensemble members from the same model than among different models. Moreover, all indicators except for the SM–LE slope demonstrate strong correlations between the coupled and uncoupled simulations using the same LMs. While the spatial distributions of breakpoint values correspond only moderately well with the indicators’ values, they improve after adjusting for model atmospheric biases of precipitation and downward radiation. The impact of the atmospheric fields on the four SM–LE indicators is well correlated between the coupled and offline experiments, except for the relationship between precipitation and the wilting point. Consequently, this indicates a significant constraint of the SM–LE relationship in coupled model simulations determined by the LM’s behavior. Thus, one may determine much about the land–atmosphere coupling behavior parsimoniously in a model system without running the fully coupled model, justifying a hierarchical approach for model development and assessment.

Journal of HydrometeorologyVol. 26(3)
George Mason University (US), Princeton University (US)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Climate variability and models
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.