Comparing Autistic and Neurotypical Responses to Conventional and Modified Questions in Algorithmically Scored Asynchronous Video Interviews: A Textual Analysis

ABSTRACT Traditional interviews often rely on social cues and abstract reasoning, posing challenges for some autistic individuals. Asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) and modifications to interview questions were evaluated as two ways to promote inclusion and equity. Autistic candidates answered conventional or modified questions (per expert feedback), which were compared to a random sample of the general population who answered conventional questions. After question modifications, group differences in algorithmically assigned scores remained, highlighting the need for accommodations. The number of words spoken was a differentiator between autistic and neurotypical job seekers. Text analysis revealed systematic differences in response content. Our study emphasizes the complexity of hiring autistic individuals, with the need for tailored accommodations and continued research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12512
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Autistic and Neurotypical Responses to Conventional and Modified Questions in Algorithmically Scored Asynchronous Video Interviews: A Textual Analysis

Annika L. Benson, Tracy Powell-Rudy, Joshua J. Prasad, Kelsie L. Colley et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
0.34
article

Comparing Autistic and Neurotypical Responses to Conventional and Modified Questions in Algorithmically Scored Asynchronous Video Interviews: A Textual Analysis

Annika L. Benson, Tracy Powell-Rudy, Joshua J. Prasad, Kelsie L. Colley, Colin Willis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Traditional interviews often rely on social cues and abstract reasoning, posing challenges for some autistic individuals. Asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) and modifications to interview questions were evaluated as two ways to promote inclusion and equity. Autistic candidates answered conventional or modified questions (per expert feedback), which were compared to a random sample of the general population who answered conventional questions. After question modifications, group differences in algorithmically assigned scores remained, highlighting the need for accommodations. The number of words spoken was a differentiator between autistic and neurotypical job seekers. Text analysis revealed systematic differences in response content. Our study emphasizes the complexity of hiring autistic individuals, with the need for tailored accommodations and continued research.

International Journal of Selection and AssessmentVol. 33(1)
Médecins Sans Frontières (JO), Colorado State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.