Comparative Study of OLGA and LedaFlow Models for Mechanistic Predictions of Hydrate Transport Dynamics

Gas hydrate formation in pipelines transporting multiphase fluids from petroleum reservoirs can lead to the formation of blockages, representing a significant flow assurance challenge. Key issues caused by hydrates include substantial increases in the viscosity of mixed liquid phases and the deposition of hydrates on the pipeline wall. This study compares two existing transient multiphase flow simulators, OLGA and LedaFlow, in terms of their estimation of hydrate formation effects on multiphase flow. Here, we compared in detail the hydrate kinetic models, parameters used, and initial condition setup approaches that influence hydrate formation and affect multiphase flow properties. Based on the comparison between the simulation results, it was found that using both simulators with default setups may not lead to comparable results under certain conditions. Adjusting input parameters, such as the stoichiometric coefficient and hydrate formation enthalpy, is necessary in order to obtain equivalent results. Hydrate modules in both simulators have also been applied to a field case. With appropriate setup, OLGA and LedaFlow produce comparable results during steady-state simulations, which align with field observations. This work provides guidelines for setting up OLGA and LedaFlow simulation models to obtain equivalent results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en17236101
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of OLGA and LedaFlow Models for Mechanistic Predictions of Hydrate Transport Dynamics

Annie Fidel-Dufour, Luis Eduardo Zerpa, Carolyn Ann Koh, Khalid Mateen et al.
2 citations
Energies
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
0.50
article

Comparative Study of OLGA and LedaFlow Models for Mechanistic Predictions of Hydrate Transport Dynamics

Annie Fidel-Dufour, Luis Eduardo Zerpa, Carolyn Ann Koh, Khalid Mateen, Anqi Qu, Luiz Fernando Rambalducci Dalla, Thierry Palermo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Gas hydrate formation in pipelines transporting multiphase fluids from petroleum reservoirs can lead to the formation of blockages, representing a significant flow assurance challenge. Key issues caused by hydrates include substantial increases in the viscosity of mixed liquid phases and the deposition of hydrates on the pipeline wall. This study compares two existing transient multiphase flow simulators, OLGA and LedaFlow, in terms of their estimation of hydrate formation effects on multiphase flow. Here, we compared in detail the hydrate kinetic models, parameters used, and initial condition setup approaches that influence hydrate formation and affect multiphase flow properties. Based on the comparison between the simulation results, it was found that using both simulators with default setups may not lead to comparable results under certain conditions. Adjusting input parameters, such as the stoichiometric coefficient and hydrate formation enthalpy, is necessary in order to obtain equivalent results. Hydrate modules in both simulators have also been applied to a field case. With appropriate setup, OLGA and LedaFlow produce comparable results during steady-state simulations, which align with field observations. This work provides guidelines for setting up OLGA and LedaFlow simulation models to obtain equivalent results.

EnergiesVol. 17(23)
Total (France) (FR), Colorado School of Mines (US), Petrobras (Brazil) (BR), Total (United States) (US)
Colorado School of Mines, Petrobras, Total
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.