Does the techno-nationalism approach work for the nation's catch-up The evaluation of MLP (2006-2020) in China

In 2006, China launched the 'National Middle and Long-Term Plan for Science and Technology Development, 2006-2020' (MLP), which proposed the indigenous innovation. It is among the most essential S&T policies during the past several decades in China, aiming to catch up with the leading countries. This plan marks a transition of China from the techno-globalism development paradigm to the techno-nationalism paradigm, along with changes in the views toward globalisation, the roles of the state, and the underlying logics. The paper examines this policy's implementation, outcomes as well as the role of techno-nationalism in China's catch-up by incorporating the institutional logics perspective. Our analysis demonstrates that, although significant progress has been made in China's science and technology, and catch-up has been realised to some degree, improvements are still needed urgently for China's further development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Management
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2025.142922
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the techno-nationalism approach work for the nation's catch-up The evaluation of MLP (2006-2020) in China

Xielin Liu, Richard P. Suttmeier, Peipei Yang, Si Zhang
1 citations
International Journal of Technology Management
Chinese history and philosophy
1.13
article

Does the techno-nationalism approach work for the nation's catch-up The evaluation of MLP (2006-2020) in China

Xielin Liu, Richard P. Suttmeier, Peipei Yang, Si Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In 2006, China launched the 'National Middle and Long-Term Plan for Science and Technology Development, 2006-2020' (MLP), which proposed the indigenous innovation. It is among the most essential S&T policies during the past several decades in China, aiming to catch up with the leading countries. This plan marks a transition of China from the techno-globalism development paradigm to the techno-nationalism paradigm, along with changes in the views toward globalisation, the roles of the state, and the underlying logics. The paper examines this policy's implementation, outcomes as well as the role of techno-nationalism in China's catch-up by incorporating the institutional logics perspective. Our analysis demonstrates that, although significant progress has been made in China's science and technology, and catch-up has been realised to some degree, improvements are still needed urgently for China's further development.

International Journal of Technology ManagementVol. 97(1)
University of Oregon (US), Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (DE), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Chinese history and philosophy
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does the techno-nationalism approach work for the nation's catch-up The evaluation of MLP (2006-2020) in China — Xielin Liu, Richard P. Suttmeier, et al. · International Journal of Technology Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS