The James Webb Space Telescope Absolute Flux Calibration. II. Mid-infrared Instrument Imaging and Coronagraphy

Abstract The absolute flux calibration of the Mid-Infrared Instrument imaging and coronagraphy is based on observations of multiple stars taken during the first 2.5 yr of James Webb Space Telescope operations. The observations were designed to ensure that the flux calibration is valid for a range of flux densities, different subarrays, and different types of stars. The flux calibration was measured by combining observed aperture photometry corrected to infinite aperture with predictions based on previous observations and models of stellar atmospheres. A subset of these observations was combined with model point-spread functions to measure the corrections to infinite aperture. Variations in the calibration factor with time, flux density, background level, type of star, subarray, integration time, rate, and well depth were investigated, and the only significant variations were with time and subarray. Observations of the same star taken approximately every month revealed a modest time-dependent response loss seen mainly at the longest wavelengths. This loss is well characterized by a decaying exponential with a time constant of ∼200 days. After correcting for the response loss, the band-dependent scatter around the corrected average (i.e., repeatability) was found to range from 0.1% to 1.2%. Signals in observations taken with different subarrays can be lower by up to 3.4% compared to FULL frame. After correcting for the time and subarray dependencies, the scatter in the calibration factors measured for individual stars ranges from 1% to 4% depending on the band. The formal uncertainties on the flux calibration averaged for all observations are 0.3%–1.0%, with longer-wavelength bands generally having larger uncertainties.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ad8cd4
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The James Webb Space Telescope Absolute Flux Calibration. II. Mid-infrared Instrument Imaging and Coronagraphy

Sarah Kendrew, George H. Rieke, G. C. Sloan, R. C. Bohlin et al.
11 citations
The Astronomical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
3.65
article

The James Webb Space Telescope Absolute Flux Calibration. II. Mid-infrared Instrument Imaging and Coronagraphy

Sarah Kendrew, George H. Rieke, G. C. Sloan, R. C. Bohlin, Andras Gáspár, Mattia Libralato, Jonathan Aguilar, Karl D. Gordon, Misty Cracraft, M. García-Marín, David R. Law, A. Noriega‐Crespo, Marjorie Decleir, Michael W. Regan
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract The absolute flux calibration of the Mid-Infrared Instrument imaging and coronagraphy is based on observations of multiple stars taken during the first 2.5 yr of James Webb Space Telescope operations. The observations were designed to ensure that the flux calibration is valid for a range of flux densities, different subarrays, and different types of stars. The flux calibration was measured by combining observed aperture photometry corrected to infinite aperture with predictions based on previous observations and models of stellar atmospheres. A subset of these observations was combined with model point-spread functions to measure the corrections to infinite aperture. Variations in the calibration factor with time, flux density, background level, type of star, subarray, integration time, rate, and well depth were investigated, and the only significant variations were with time and subarray. Observations of the same star taken approximately every month revealed a modest time-dependent response loss seen mainly at the longest wavelengths. This loss is well characterized by a decaying exponential with a time constant of ∼200 days. After correcting for the response loss, the band-dependent scatter around the corrected average (i.e., repeatability) was found to range from 0.1% to 1.2%. Signals in observations taken with different subarrays can be lower by up to 3.4% compared to FULL frame. After correcting for the time and subarray dependencies, the scatter in the calibration factors measured for individual stars ranges from 1% to 4% depending on the band. The formal uncertainties on the flux calibration averaged for all observations are 0.3%–1.0%, with longer-wavelength bands generally having larger uncertainties.

The Astronomical JournalVol. 169(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
3.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.