„Ein Minimum von unabdingbaren erziehungswissenschaftlichen Inhalten und Grundlagenwissen“ – Kerncurricula der Erziehungswissenschaft im Rückblick

This article focuses on the disciplinary society’s recommendations for the design of educational science degree programs as an expression of symbolic boundary work on internal and externally visible disciplinary boundaries. To this end, this article takes a retrospective perspective on the core curricular recommendations for the design of study programs of the German Educational Research Association in the period from 1968 to 2010. It asks what the initial points of the core curricula were, how and what is expressed in the definition of a “core” about disciplinary boundaries, and how these questions are also connected with the study program landscape. Differences between the (changing) core curricula indicate how the balance between openness towards differentiation processes and plural disciplinary perspectives was achieved in the resolutions of a “corpus” of common, disciplinary knowledge.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Erziehungswissenschaft
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3224/ezw.v35i2.03
Primary Topic
Sociology and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

„Ein Minimum von unabdingbaren erziehungswissenschaftlichen Inhalten und Grundlagenwissen“ – Kerncurricula der Erziehungswissenschaft im Rückblick

Katharina Vogel, Katja Ludwig
Erziehungswissenschaft
Sociology and Education Studies
article

„Ein Minimum von unabdingbaren erziehungswissenschaftlichen Inhalten und Grundlagenwissen“ – Kerncurricula der Erziehungswissenschaft im Rückblick

Katharina Vogel, Katja Ludwig
article en

Abstract

This article focuses on the disciplinary society’s recommendations for the design of educational science degree programs as an expression of symbolic boundary work on internal and externally visible disciplinary boundaries. To this end, this article takes a retrospective perspective on the core curricular recommendations for the design of study programs of the German Educational Research Association in the period from 1968 to 2010. It asks what the initial points of the core curricula were, how and what is expressed in the definition of a “core” about disciplinary boundaries, and how these questions are also connected with the study program landscape. Differences between the (changing) core curricula indicate how the balance between openness towards differentiation processes and plural disciplinary perspectives was achieved in the resolutions of a “corpus” of common, disciplinary knowledge.

ErziehungswissenschaftVol. 35(2-2024)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Sociology and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.