The 1,7-malaria reactive community-based testing and response (1,7-mRCTR) approach in Tanzania: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Our analysis demonstrates that the 1,7-mRCTR intervention appears to be cost-effective under a willingness-to-pay threshold of 417 USD per DALY averted, showing that modified RACD strategies can provide value for money in moderate-to-high transmission settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-024-01261-w
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The 1,7-malaria reactive community-based testing and response (1,7-mRCTR) approach in Tanzania: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Márcia C. Castro, Prosper Chaki, Michael Mihayo, Muhidin K. Mahende et al.
3 citations
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Malaria Research and Control
1.63
article

The 1,7-malaria reactive community-based testing and response (1,7-mRCTR) approach in Tanzania: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Márcia C. Castro, Prosper Chaki, Michael Mihayo, Muhidin K. Mahende, Wilbald Anthony, Honorati Masanja, Godlove Chila, Ning Xiao, Katia J. Bruxvoort, Duoquan Wang, Fadhila Kihwele, Radhika P. Tampi, Felix Brown, Nicolas A. Menzies, Salim Abdulla, Tegemeo Gavana, Yeromin P. Mlacha, Hajirani M. Msuya, Wei Chang, Jessica Cohen, Augustine Kuwawenaruwa
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Our analysis demonstrates that the 1,7-mRCTR intervention appears to be cost-effective under a willingness-to-pay threshold of 417 USD per DALY averted, showing that modified RACD strategies can provide value for money in moderate-to-high transmission settings.

Infectious Diseases of PovertyVol. 13(1)
Ifakara Health Institute (TZ), Harvard University (US), National Institute for Parasitic Diseases (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Harvard University Press (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Harvard Global Health Institute (US), Africa Academy for Public Health (TZ), World Bank Group (US)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Malaria Research and Control
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.