Light exposure differs by sex in the US, with females receiving less bright light

Light is the primary entraining cue for the circadian system and has other, non-circadian, effects on health. Sex differences in light exposure patterns could drive sex differences in health outcomes. Real-world light exposure (measured with wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+) was investigated in the 2011-2014 U.S.-based National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with metrics reflecting duration in and timing of exposure at different light levels. Sex differences were tested using two-sample t-tests and linear regression models. Occupational and physical activity-related factors were also explored as contributing factors using linear regression models adjusted for age, season, and race/ethnicity. 11,314 NHANES participants (age range: 3-80+, 52.2% females) were included in the analysis. The results show males spending approximately 52% more time in bright light than females, with this sex difference beginning in childhood. While further research is needed, these findings may be due to sex differences in indoor vs. outdoor activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Biological Timing and Sleep
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44323-024-00016-y
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Light exposure differs by sex in the US, with females receiving less bright light

Danielle A Wallace
6 citations
npj Biological Timing and Sleep
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
1.89
article

Light exposure differs by sex in the US, with females receiving less bright light

Danielle A Wallace
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Light is the primary entraining cue for the circadian system and has other, non-circadian, effects on health. Sex differences in light exposure patterns could drive sex differences in health outcomes. Real-world light exposure (measured with wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+) was investigated in the 2011-2014 U.S.-based National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with metrics reflecting duration in and timing of exposure at different light levels. Sex differences were tested using two-sample t-tests and linear regression models. Occupational and physical activity-related factors were also explored as contributing factors using linear regression models adjusted for age, season, and race/ethnicity. 11,314 NHANES participants (age range: 3-80+, 52.2% females) were included in the analysis. The results show males spending approximately 52% more time in bright light than females, with this sex difference beginning in childhood. While further research is needed, these findings may be due to sex differences in indoor vs. outdoor activities.

npj Biological Timing and SleepVol. 1(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Circadian (United States) (US)
Sleep Research Society, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
1.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Light exposure differs by sex in the US, with females receiving less bright light — Danielle A Wallace · npj Biological Timing and Sleep (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS