How Good are Current Pocket-Based 3D Generative Models?: The Benchmark Set and Evaluation of Protein Pocket-Based 3D Molecular Generative Models

The development of a three-dimensional (3D) molecular generative model based on protein pockets has recently attracted a lot of attention. This type of model aims to achieve the simultaneous generation of molecular graphs and 3D binding conformation under the constraint of protein binding. Various pocket-based generative models have been proposed; however, currently, there is a lack of systematic and objective evaluation metrics for these models. To address this issue, a comprehensive benchmark data set, named POKMOL-3D, is proposed to evaluate protein pocket-based 3D molecular generative models. It includes 32 protein targets together with their known active compounds as a test set to evaluate the versatility of generation models to mimic the real-world scenario. Additionally, a series of two-dimensional (2D) and 3D evaluation metrics with some newly created ones was integrated to assess the quality of generated molecular structures and their binding conformations. It is expected that this work can enhance our comprehension of the effectiveness and weakness of current 3D generative models and stimulate the discussion on challenges and useful guidance for developing the next wave of molecular generative models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01598
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Good are Current Pocket-Based 3D Generative Models?: The Benchmark Set and Evaluation of Protein Pocket-Based 3D Molecular Generative Models

Jinping Lei, Mingyuan Xu, Zhangming Niu, Ting Ran et al.
14 citations
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
5.06
article

How Good are Current Pocket-Based 3D Generative Models?: The Benchmark Set and Evaluation of Protein Pocket-Based 3D Molecular Generative Models

Jinping Lei, Mingyuan Xu, Zhangming Niu, Ting Ran, Yifei Qin, Jia‐Qiang Wu, Hongming Chen, Haoyang Liu, Xianglu Xiao
article en
14 citations

Abstract

The development of a three-dimensional (3D) molecular generative model based on protein pockets has recently attracted a lot of attention. This type of model aims to achieve the simultaneous generation of molecular graphs and 3D binding conformation under the constraint of protein binding. Various pocket-based generative models have been proposed; however, currently, there is a lack of systematic and objective evaluation metrics for these models. To address this issue, a comprehensive benchmark data set, named POKMOL-3D, is proposed to evaluate protein pocket-based 3D molecular generative models. It includes 32 protein targets together with their known active compounds as a test set to evaluate the versatility of generation models to mimic the real-world scenario. Additionally, a series of two-dimensional (2D) and 3D evaluation metrics with some newly created ones was integrated to assess the quality of generated molecular structures and their binding conformations. It is expected that this work can enhance our comprehension of the effectiveness and weakness of current 3D generative models and stimulate the discussion on challenges and useful guidance for developing the next wave of molecular generative models.

Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingVol. 64(24)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Nankai University (CN), Lung Institute (US), RSPC MT (BY), Wuyi University (CN), Imperial College London (GB), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Recruitment Program of Global Experts, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
5.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.