The evolving landscape of spatial proteomics technologies in the AI age

Although single-cell technologies have provided deep insights into cellular heterogeneity and complexity, they fall short in explaining how cells form tissue structures, a crucial aspect for understanding the principles of complex tissues. Recently, spatial transcriptomics has begun to fill this gap, allowing in situ studies of tissues at cellular and subcellular resolution. However, these genomic-level methods primarily provide indirect measurements of cellular states, as most biological processes are controlled by proteins. Therefore, spatial proteomics has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of biological processes, with significant implications for both basic cell biology and clinical applications. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent technical achievements and remaining challenges in spatial proteomics. Specifically, we categorize the techniques into three main types: antibody-based, LC-MS/MS-based, and imaging mass spectrometry-based. We describe each method in detail and discuss its strengths and weaknesses. We also discuss the emerging opportunities of artificial intelligence for spatial proteomics. Finally, we review key issues and suggest future directions for the advancement of spatial proteomics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fundamental Research
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2024.11.023
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The evolving landscape of spatial proteomics technologies in the AI age

Beiyu Hu, Jun‐Jie Zhu, Fangqing Zhao
11 citations
Fundamental Research
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
2.57
article

The evolving landscape of spatial proteomics technologies in the AI age

Beiyu Hu, Jun‐Jie Zhu, Fangqing Zhao
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Although single-cell technologies have provided deep insights into cellular heterogeneity and complexity, they fall short in explaining how cells form tissue structures, a crucial aspect for understanding the principles of complex tissues. Recently, spatial transcriptomics has begun to fill this gap, allowing in situ studies of tissues at cellular and subcellular resolution. However, these genomic-level methods primarily provide indirect measurements of cellular states, as most biological processes are controlled by proteins. Therefore, spatial proteomics has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of biological processes, with significant implications for both basic cell biology and clinical applications. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent technical achievements and remaining challenges in spatial proteomics. Specifically, we categorize the techniques into three main types: antibody-based, LC-MS/MS-based, and imaging mass spectrometry-based. We describe each method in detail and discuss its strengths and weaknesses. We also discuss the emerging opportunities of artificial intelligence for spatial proteomics. Finally, we review key issues and suggest future directions for the advancement of spatial proteomics.

Fundamental ResearchVol. 6(1)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Zoology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
2.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The evolving landscape of spatial proteomics technologies in the AI age — Beiyu Hu, Jun‐Jie Zhu, et al. · Fundamental Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS