Real time monitoring of Rn-222 in workplaces and estimation of working time correction factor

The potential of electronic monitors for evaluating radon exposure is still not fully harnessed, and tests under real conditions are scarce. Ten workplaces were continuously monitored for a year with the radon measurement network of Sofia University, with calibrated and metrologically assured RadonEye +2 monitors. In 7 of the workplaces the average activity concentration of radon during the working time was significantly lower than the total time average. This difference is attributed to behavioral patterns. The ratio of the working time and the total time average (called working time correction factor k WT ) for the whole year ranged from 0.71 to 0.98. Its weekly values varied significantly with coefficients of variation between 9 and 28%. Therefore, using short term estimates of k WT to correct the total time radon average determined by passive detectors could lead to bias. The workplaces also exhibited different seasonal radon patterns, although most were offices with similar schedules. In most pairs of workplaces the monthly averages were correlated very weakly or even negatively. This indicates that seasonal radon variations could be specific to each workplace. The value of k WT also varied with the season, suggesting that seasonal variations of radon during working hours might differ from those observed with passive integrating detectors. Overall, long-term follow-up by metrologically assured electronic monitors could help to improve and personalize the estimate of radon exposure of workers. These monitors could potentially support smart anti-radon systems with optimal operation schedules, thereby contributing to the reduction of the energy impact of buildings. • Electronic radon monitors offer better and tailored estimate of exposure at work • In 10 workplaces working time to total time radon ratio was between 0.71 and 0.98 • Working time radon correction found for one-week or one-season can be biased • Seasonal radon variations inside and outside working hours can differ significantly • Monthly radon fluctuations can be badly correlated even in similar workplaces

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Measurements
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107359
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real time monitoring of Rn-222 in workplaces and estimation of working time correction factor

K. Mitev, S. Georgiev, Vladislav Todorov, Ì. Dimitrova
2 citations
Radiation Measurements
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
0.90
article

Real time monitoring of Rn-222 in workplaces and estimation of working time correction factor

K. Mitev, S. Georgiev, Vladislav Todorov, Ì. Dimitrova
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The potential of electronic monitors for evaluating radon exposure is still not fully harnessed, and tests under real conditions are scarce. Ten workplaces were continuously monitored for a year with the radon measurement network of Sofia University, with calibrated and metrologically assured RadonEye +2 monitors. In 7 of the workplaces the average activity concentration of radon during the working time was significantly lower than the total time average. This difference is attributed to behavioral patterns. The ratio of the working time and the total time average (called working time correction factor k WT ) for the whole year ranged from 0.71 to 0.98. Its weekly values varied significantly with coefficients of variation between 9 and 28%. Therefore, using short term estimates of k WT to correct the total time radon average determined by passive detectors could lead to bias. The workplaces also exhibited different seasonal radon patterns, although most were offices with similar schedules. In most pairs of workplaces the monthly averages were correlated very weakly or even negatively. This indicates that seasonal radon variations could be specific to each workplace. The value of k WT also varied with the season, suggesting that seasonal variations of radon during working hours might differ from those observed with passive integrating detectors. Overall, long-term follow-up by metrologically assured electronic monitors could help to improve and personalize the estimate of radon exposure of workers. These monitors could potentially support smart anti-radon systems with optimal operation schedules, thereby contributing to the reduction of the energy impact of buildings. • Electronic radon monitors offer better and tailored estimate of exposure at work • In 10 workplaces working time to total time radon ratio was between 0.71 and 0.98 • Working time radon correction found for one-week or one-season can be biased • Seasonal radon variations inside and outside working hours can differ significantly • Monthly radon fluctuations can be badly correlated even in similar workplaces

Radiation MeasurementsVol. 181
Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" (BG)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
0.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.