What Radiographic and Spinopelvic Parameters do Spine Surgeons Consider in Decision-Making for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis?

Study DesignCross-sectional survey.ObjectiveSurgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is remarkably varied due to heterogeneity of clinical-radiological presentations. This study aimed to assess which spinopelvic radiological parameters were considered for decision-making.MethodsSurvey distributed to International AO Spine members to analyze surgeons' considerations for treatment. Data collected includes demographics, training background, years of experience, and treatment decisions based on various radiographical findings, including segmental and global spinopelvic parameters.ResultsFrom 479 responses, the most frequently radiological parameter considered was slippage on dynamic X-rays (79.1%), followed by disc height (78.9%), global sagittal balance SVA (71.4%), and PI-LL mismatch (69.7%), while the least important was absolute spondylolisthesis on static lateral radiograph (22.8%). Fellowship-trained surgeons were likelier to use SVA (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.02-2.99, <i>P</i> = 0.049), and disc height (2.13, 1.14-3.98, <i>P</i> < 0.05). There was no difference between orthopedics and neurosurgery in applying SVA and PI-LL mismatch. Surgeons from Asia Pacific emphasizes segmental lordosis (2.39, 1.11-5.15, <i>P</i> = 0.026) as from Latin America (2.55, 1.09-5.95, <i>P</i> = 0.030) and Middle East (4.33, 1.66-11.28, <i>P</i> = 0.003). However, surgeons from Latin America and Middle East also significant consider disc height (2.95, 1.07-8.15, <i>P</i> = 0.037) and (3.03, 1.04-8.83, <i>P</i> = 0.043), respectively. Additionally, the surgeons' age was associated with using angular motion on flexion-extension radiographs, and volume of treated cases yearly with consideration for disc height.ConclusionsTreatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis was influenced by slippage on dynamic radiographs, disc height, global alignment, and PI-LL mismatch. Surgeons' age and Region, fellowship-trained, and volume of treated cases were significantly associated to apply these radiological parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241306105
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Radiographic and Spinopelvic Parameters do Spine Surgeons Consider in Decision-Making for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis?

Luca Ambrosio, Ashish D. Diwan, Sathish Muthu, Mandeep S. Virk et al.
1 citations
Global Spine Journal
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
0.42
article

What Radiographic and Spinopelvic Parameters do Spine Surgeons Consider in Decision-Making for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis?

Luca Ambrosio, Ashish D. Diwan, Sathish Muthu, Mandeep S. Virk, Juan Pablo Cabrera, Zorica Buser, Samuel Kang-Wook Cho, S. Tim Yoon, Jeffrey C. Wang, Patrick C.H. Hsieh, The AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Study DesignCross-sectional survey.ObjectiveSurgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is remarkably varied due to heterogeneity of clinical-radiological presentations. This study aimed to assess which spinopelvic radiological parameters were considered for decision-making.MethodsSurvey distributed to International AO Spine members to analyze surgeons' considerations for treatment. Data collected includes demographics, training background, years of experience, and treatment decisions based on various radiographical findings, including segmental and global spinopelvic parameters.ResultsFrom 479 responses, the most frequently radiological parameter considered was slippage on dynamic X-rays (79.1%), followed by disc height (78.9%), global sagittal balance SVA (71.4%), and PI-LL mismatch (69.7%), while the least important was absolute spondylolisthesis on static lateral radiograph (22.8%). Fellowship-trained surgeons were likelier to use SVA (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.02-2.99, <i>P</i> = 0.049), and disc height (2.13, 1.14-3.98, <i>P</i> < 0.05). There was no difference between orthopedics and neurosurgery in applying SVA and PI-LL mismatch. Surgeons from Asia Pacific emphasizes segmental lordosis (2.39, 1.11-5.15, <i>P</i> = 0.026) as from Latin America (2.55, 1.09-5.95, <i>P</i> = 0.030) and Middle East (4.33, 1.66-11.28, <i>P</i> = 0.003). However, surgeons from Latin America and Middle East also significant consider disc height (2.95, 1.07-8.15, <i>P</i> = 0.037) and (3.03, 1.04-8.83, <i>P</i> = 0.043), respectively. Additionally, the surgeons' age was associated with using angular motion on flexion-extension radiographs, and volume of treated cases yearly with consideration for disc height.ConclusionsTreatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis was influenced by slippage on dynamic radiographs, disc height, global alignment, and PI-LL mismatch. Surgeons' age and Region, fellowship-trained, and volume of treated cases were significantly associated to apply these radiological parameters.

Global Spine JournalVol. 15(5)
University of Southern California (US), Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Emory University (US), Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), University of Concepción (CL), Cornell University (US), AO Foundation (CH), California Southern University (US), UNSW Sydney (AU), Syracuse Orthopedic Specialists (US), Hospital Regional de Concepción (CL), St George Hospital (AU), Orthopaedic Research Group (IN), Government Medical College and Hospital (IN), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT), St. George Hospital (IN), Neurological Surgery (US), AOSpine (CH), The University of Adelaide (AU), New York University (US), Karpagam Academy of Higher Education (IN), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
AO Foundation
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.